From: Maniaci, Bridget
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 12:39 PM
To: ALL ALDERS; May, Michael; Mendoza, Mario; Cieslewicz, Dave; supplea@hammescosports.com; Murphy, Brad
Subject: landmarks referal motion
Thank you so much for eveyone who has been working so hard to find productive, cooperative efforts to move forward in this process.
Alders Cnare, Rummel, Verveer, Bidar-Sielaf and myself have worked on this motion. Additionally, the Hammes Co. are in support of the following referal motion, I hope you will be too!
Bridget
(do not reply all!)
********
The Common Council hereby refers the appeal by the Hammes Company of the Landmarks Commission decision for the Edgewater redevelopment to the Februrary 23rd Common Council meeting following project deliberations and a recommendation on the project being made by the Urban Design Commission and Plan Commission. The Common Council requests the recommendations of the Urban Design and Plan Commission for the February 23 Common Council meeting. Additionally, the Common Council supports the rehabilitation of the 1940s building and redevelopment of the Edgewater site as a whole.
Tuesday, January 5, 2010
Referral Motion Expected on the Edgewater Tonight
Here's the text expected to be introduced . . .
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
How about replacing the second sentence with something like this:
ReplyDelete"The Common Council requests recommendations of the Urban Design and Plan Commissions for modifying the project to address the concerns of the Landmarks Preservation Commission for the February 23 Common Council Meeting. The Common Council intends to refer these recommendations back to the Landmarks Preservation Commission for its recommendation."
How can this be true?
ReplyDeleteAccording to Mayor Dave, Tim Bruer and Bob Dunn, what was presented at Landmarks was Hammes absolute, final, best, ultimate, take-it-or-leave-it proposal.
What's a person to believe anymore?
And change the "myself" in the second to last sentence to "I."
ReplyDelete