Sunday, March 30, 2008

March 31 - The week ahead

A fifth Monday, election day, Overture Finances, Economic Develpment Plan and oh, so much more . . . some of which might not yet be noticed . . .

Monday, March 31, 2008
4:30 PM 201 STATE FOUNDATION INC BOARD OF DIRECTORS 201 STATE ST. OVERTURE CENTER FOR THE ARTS BOARDROOM
  • Financial Report
4:30 PM BOARD OF ESTIMATES ROOM GR-27 CCB
6:00 PM MADISON CULTURAL ARTS DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS 201 STATE ST, BOARDROOM
  • Financial Report & Long Range Financial Planning
Tuesday, April 1, 2008
9:00 AM COMMON COUNCIL DISCUSSION ON EXPANDED NOTIFICATION FOR SNOW EMERGENCIES ROOM 104 CCB
  • The agenda, not noticed looks something like this:
    • Public education and communication - ongoing education about alt. side parking, snow emergency zone, etc.
      • Partnering with:
        • Neighborhood groups
        • Landlords
        • Employers
        • UW
      • Immediate communication about snow emergencies
        • Using blast text-messaging
        • UW email
        • Neighborhood listservs
        • Traditional press releases, radio, TV
Wednesday, April 2, 2008
5:00 PM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION ROOM LL-120 MMB
5:00 PM HOUSING COMMITTEE ROOM LL-110 MMB
Friday, April 4, 2008
11:00 AM EMPLOYMENT SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE ALLIED TASK FORCE ROOM LL130 MMB

Read more!

My Vote Finally Counts!

So, I didn't vote in the Wisconsin Primary this year, because there was nothing to vote for. However, yesterday, the results of my presidential primary vote were announced. And I was chosen to be a delegate to the National Green Party Convention in Chicago this summer on behalf of Cynthia McKinney. That's right, not Ralph Nader, whom I'm afraid many might assume would be the Green Party Candidate. And sadly, as I consider Ralph Nader's running mate, Matt Gonzalez a friend, it is sort of difficult. However, I will be voting for and supporting Cynthia McKinney. Here's the announcement:
Cynthia McKinney Wins Big in Wisconsin

(Oshkosh) The Wisconsin Green Party Spring Gathering and Presidential Preference Convention was held today at the River Center at the Gruenhagen Conference Center, UW Oshkosh.

Cynthia McKinney received an overwhelming majority of the votes cast in the Wisconsin Green Party Presidential Preference Primary. McKinney received 79% of the vote; Kent Mesplay received 10%, Write-Ins for Ralph Nader 5%, Kat Swift 2%, Uncommitted 2%, and Jesse Johnson 1%.

Ralph Nader is not seeking the nomination of the Green Party of the United States.

Both McKinney and Mesplay campaigned in Wisconsin this past fall.

Wisconsin is allotted 24 delegates to the Green Party of the United States Presidential Nominating Convention, July 10-13, 2008 in Chicago. There, 836 delegates from around the country will determine the Green Party's nominee for President of the United States.

In Oshkosh Green Party members chose 24 delegates to the national convention representing the ballot results. Nineteen delegates were allotted to Cynthia McKinney, two to Kent Mesplay, one to Ralph Nader, one to Kat Swift, and one for Uncommitted.

Delegates are pledged to vote for the candidates to whom they are allotted for the first round in Chicago. For the second and subsequent rounds, candidates are instructed to vote only for candidates who have agreed to accept the nomination of the Green Party of the United States, and have agreed to run on all Green Party ballot lines.

The Green Party currently has 21 state ballot lines, and is working to obtain more.

"Wisconsin Greens have a lot of respect for the work that McKinney has done in Congress, particularly her persistent opposition to the war, her fight for social justice, and her concern for our environmental health," said Ronald Hardy, co-chair of the Wisconsin Green Party.

For more information visit http://www.wisconsingreenparty.org


Read more!

Friday, March 28, 2008

Tonight. Food, Fun and Feel Good!!

Tonight 5 - 7 at the Cardinal Bar is the 6th Annual "Iron Chef" Cook-off for the Tenant Resource Center. Please join us and our friends! $20 suggested donation, but we ask that you give as appropriate for you, more or less, just come join us and help support the Tenant Resource Center and our Housing Crisis Fund which helps individuals and families who are at risk of being evicted stay in their homes. And . . . have some fun!

Good food by our community chefs
Avocado Battle - Mike Jacob, Jim Kellerman, Jacque Pokorney
Cinnamon Battle - Heidi Konkel vs. Mike Quieto
Mushroom Battle - Police Captain Mary Schauf, Tobi Silgman
Turkey Battle - Gary Gorman vs. reigning champion Chris Laurent

Judges
Carousel Bayrd ~ Dane County Supervisor
Andy Heidt ~ Dane County Ombudsman
Vikki Kratz ~ The Isthmus
Mark Pocan ~ State Representative
Mary Rathbun ~ (unfortunately, formerly of . . . )The Capital Times
Lee Rayburn ~ The Mic 92.1

Come early, the food goes quick!! If you can't make it, you can donate on-line! This year it is more important than ever since we lost two large funding sources last year (UW SSFC because we were no longer considered a Student Organization - $55,000 and HUD - $41,000 because they have shifting priorities due to the foreclosure crisis.) and after letting our student employees go and laying off one staff person, we still have to raise $30,000 to keep our doors open. With your help tonight and the help of our sponsors below, we should be 1/3 of the way to meeting that goal!!!

If you see our sponsors, please thank them!!!

Madison Gas & Electric

Associated Bank · Sonja Moskalik & Jim Roper · Tim Radelet · Margaux Shields & Jennifer Halsey · Gregg Shimanski · Chuck Smalley · Wegner LLP CPAs and Consultants · Bill White & Kathie Nichols

Mary Anglim · Jen Hitomi Bond · Curt Brink · Dave Cieslewicz · Club TNT – Today Not Tomorrow · Common Wealth Development · Martine Davis · Connie Deer · Ken Golden · Andy Heidt · Michael, Lisa & Corey Jacob · Marsha Mansfield & Steve Schooler · Denise Matyka · Don & Marj Passman · Jacque Pokorney · Mike Quieto · Renaissance Property Group · Rick Richards · Juscha Robinson & Steve Herrick · Vicky Selkowe & Jason Engle · Barbara Smith · Paul Soglin · Brian Solomon · Gary Tipler · Matt Veldran · Voices Newspaper · Dick Wagner · Sue Wallinger & Agustin Olvera · Dace Zeps & Tim Dean

Crystel Anders · Michael & Pamela Barrett · Michael & Sarah Basford · Carousel Bayrd · Brian Benford · Capital City Hues · Carol Carstensen · Nan Cheney · Betty Chewning · Joe Clausius · Jack Clubb · Wendy Cooper · Susan Corrado · Aaron Crandall · Sarah Davis & Heather Schaller · Chuck Erickson · Kathleen Falk · Liz Falk · Marilyn Feil · Dan Guerra · Sheila Guilfoyle · Greta Hansen & Gary Kallas · Kristin Hoffschmidt · Julia Kerr · Austin King · Christine Lidbury · Emmy Lita · Dean Loumos · Jessa Lutz · Leslie McAllister · John Merrill · Eileen Mershart · Rosalie Migas · Ben Nichols · Rainbow Bookstore Cooperative · Faris Rashid · Satya Rhodes-Conway · Dianne
Riley · Erika Schneider · Sarah Shatz · Arlene Silveira · Julie Spears · Vicky Szewczyk · Mike Verveer · Amy Westra · Bill Whitford · Cheryl Wittke · Ledell Zeller

Read more!

Thursday, March 27, 2008

East Gorham Closed this Summer? Meeting tonight!!

Two way Johnson trial? Underground the electrical wiring? Where will the buses go? Pedestrian street lighting? How will you get to your house? Where will you park? How long will it take? What is the best alternate bike route? Where will over $20,000 cars per day go? And how? Find out tonight!!! Here's the full notice:
Neighborhood Meeting
Thursday, March 27, 2008
6:30 p.m.
Warner Park Community Recreation Center
1625 Northport Drive

The City is proposing a project on E Gorham St, from west of N Baldwin St. thru the N. Livingston St. intersection, the main purpose of which is to replace the sanitary sewer main constructed between 1904 and 1906. The project will also include new water main, repair of deteriorated sections of curb and new asphalt surface.

The primary purpose of this meeting is to discuss issues related to managing traffic during construction. Two option being considered. The first is to close the road to through traffic, during construction, with a traffic detour. Closing the roadway to through traffic will shorten the duration of the project and reduce the cost. The second option would allow through traffic through the construction zone. If the roadway is kept open to traffic, the capacity of the roadway will be limited to less than half of the existing capacity, during peak travel times.
What the notice doesn't say is that there is additional work happening on E Gorham from N. Livingston to Butler as well. It's sure to be another summer of messy traffic.
Read more!

The Future of the Bus System: April is a BIG month!

The Long Range Metro Committee report is about to be released and needs input and the annual improvements/cuts hearing is coming up as well. Lots of information below and big meetings on April 10th, 14th, 15th and 16th. Your input is needed to make sure that the changes Metro is thinking about actually work for YOU - the riders. Information from their newsletter below.

#
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: August Service Change Proposals
Tuesday, April 15 at 6:00 PM

A public hearing will be held by the City of Madison Transit and Parking Commission in Room GR-27 of the City County Building, 210 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., on Tuesday, April 15 at 6:00 PM to address service change proposals.

Interested persons are encouraged to attend the public hearing to give feedback on proposals that focus on improving on-time performance and capacity of service that have declined because of recent service reductions.

A comprehensive approach is being proposed that will involve route realignments in peripheral and core areas and the addition of new services.

Complete background information including: a general description and justification of proposed service changes; a description of the perceived benefits and reductions of the proposal; draft maps and schedules; and paratransit service impacts is now available by clicking on the "Public Hearing Information" link below.

A hard copy of this notice will be available soon on all buses. Hard copy packets of this information will be available soon at Madison libraries. To request a packet by mail, contact the Metro customer service center at (608) 266-4466, TTY/Textnet: (866) 704-2316, or mymetrobus@cityofmadison.com.

Public Hearing Information

#
PUBLIC INPUT MEETINGS SCHEDULED
Long-Range Metro Planning Ad Hoc Committee

A long-range Metro Transit planning ad hoc committee has been charged with exploring
ways of improving Metro service and securing adequate funding that moves Metro beyond the cycle of fare increases, service cuts and extraordinary increases in general fund support.

Public feedback was solicited on an interim report. A draft final report has been created incorporating this feedback along with further exploration and discussions by the committee.

Public meetings have been scheduled to again ask for input. After public input has been recorded and reviewed by the committee, a final report will be provided to the Mayor's office.

A copy of the draft final report for review and input consideration will be available soon. An online and printed survey will also be made available for those unable to attend these meetings.

Public Meeting Schedule



Read more!

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Economic Development: Who Cares?

I attended most of all three economic development plan "listening" sessions yesterday, against my better judgment. While it took 7.5 hours of time I really didn't have and where I should have been working, it actually was probably worth it. I'm not sure I"ve sorted out exactly where we are, but after listening for hours here's a few initial observations.

1. I'm not sure what this plan is going to change, if anything.
The report is really kind of "duh". Even the consultant says it is about the basics. It basically boils down to
  • build relationships and listen to business leaders in informal settings
  • do what you are doing (zoning code re-write, one-stop shop, changing TIF policies, 311)
  • be more thoughtful and methodical about what you do
  • use technology
  • communicate better
  • set priorities and don't be afraid to spend money
That might be a little unfair, but the plan doesn't have any shockers in it and most people won't see any dramatic changes. In fact, that's the meat of the plan: Quietly have coffee and meet "informally" with lots of people and listen.

2. This discussion and process may have been more valuable than the end result.
While I was hopeful that we would end up with an economic development plan that everyone could support and give us clear direction for moving forward, a checklist of things to do, its clear that won't happen. However, the discussion has been valuable in that it has shed light on a few things
  • As a city we're not in crisis and are doing relatively well, and that's part of our lack of urgency.
  • The city is doing things well, but doesn't take enough credit for the things we do so we need to communicate that better.
  • There is room for improvement, but it won't take dramatic and sweeping changes.
  • We need more staff and better training opportunities for them.
We didn't uncover any major problems or catastrophes. (Well, except our poverty rate which is higher than the national average.)

3. Public/private partnerships and the struggle for transparency and local government.
I'm a little glib about having coffee, but the heart of the plan is building relationships quietly behind the scenes and having the mayor and key staff being in a high powered informal coffee club to communicate with the top dogs in the business/employer community. While I understand the value of this type of relationship building and spend a fair amount of time in coffee shops myself - it strikes me as odd that any push back about the transparency and exclusivity of that strategy is met with such vehement protestations. Open meetings and open records are important to this community at its heart and I do think that we need to be careful here. As one participant put it, all is not lost and we can do public/private partnerships in a Madison-unique kind of way that honors transparency and I'd like to see that happen. However, others said that business people won't show up to public meetings, so I'm not sure where we are on this issue. Additionally, if we just meet with the usual suspects it leaves out large segments of the community that likely have much to contribute. If we want to "grow our own" when it comes to business we have to know who those folks are that have something to offer and the above strategy doesn't allow for that.

4. Our "toolbox" is weak.
We can't give tax breaks, so we are left with TIF, taking CDBG funds from other community uses, using our CDA more (I'm not going there today.), creating more BIDS, writing more grants or capital borrowing. No surprises here either. We're using these tools but the consultant says we have to be more strategic about it. He wins big points with me there especially when it comes to TIF. The City has to set the priorities and have the business community respond with proposals about how to address City needs instead of us reacting to projects that are brought forward by the development community that may or may not meet our undefined priorities. If we could do this we would be much more predictable to deal with and we could focus on growing our community in ways that benefit us more.

5. Leadership?
So, will the plan sit on the shelf or will something happen? As the consultant said several times yesterday, his work is done here and the rest is up to us.

Unfortunately, I don't think this plan will pass the council. Why? Well, the council passed a list of objectives of what we wanted to get out of the plan. The next thing we hear, the plan focuses mostly on our current large businesses and basic sector jobs. We weren't part of that decision making and I don't think people agree that this is where we should focus. When I hear complaints about the plan from Judy Compton and Marsha Rummel, Joe Clausius and Julia Kerr, Zach Brandon and myself, it just doesn't look very promising.

Can this be fixed? Probably. Will someone step up and be a leader and make it happen? Probably not. I think this is a HUGE missed opportunity. We could have a real discussion about what we all think about economic development and what we should do - or we could "receive" the report and put it on a shelf and continue to grumble about economic development.

Note: The only alders to show up to the meetings yesterday were myself and Mark Clear.

6. Do we really need consultants and what value do they bring?
I'd hate to be a consultant coming in to the City of Madison. It can't be easy. I think we as a community hire consultants when we are looking for an answer we can't find ourselves and then we are disappointed when the consultants don't turn out to be any smarter than the rest of us. If they give us a "duh" report, we wonder why we spent the money to hear what we already know.

And then, there's the unfortunate problem of them not knowing and understanding the community and making mis-steps based on assumptions they make about us based on a few conversations they have had with various individuals.

So, after sitting through all those "listening" sessions yesterday, I think I've come to the conclusion that this report being uneventful is in some ways a compliment to our community. In other ways, a HUGE missed opportunity in that we aren't moving forward as a community in agreement and I don't think we're going to get there. I'd like to see us do better, this is important.


Read more!

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Police make a mistake

And now, instead of admitting the mistake, they compound it by thinking they can just ignore ordinances they asked the Council to pass. Interesting.

So, I was lambasted for not supporting the police in their foolish ideas to not respond to burglary alarms (verified response ordinance). The first mistake they made was applying this policy to both homes and businesses. They quickly changed their minds and only applied it to businesses - the first time they decided to ignore the law instead of working to get it changed. Then, a few years later, they decide they made a foolish decision, but instead of coming back to the council to fix the ordinance they urged us to pass in the first place, they quietly declare us and our ordinances a minor technicality for the second time.

I admire the audacity, b
ut ordinance passed 14 -3 (I was one of the three against). We now have a law that the police feel like they don't have to follow, that doesn't seem like a good example to be setting. I know they are the police, but how can they just ignore laws they asked us to pass? How many other laws do they in their infinite wisdom decide are not worthy of enforcing or following? I know police are supposed to exercise discretion in individual circumstances, but are they supposed to wholesale ignore laws?

I suppose, it is the Common Council's fault in a way since we have fostered an environment where they believe they can just ignore us. However, at some point, why bother passing laws if the police will just do what they want. By the way, where is that report that Chief Wray refused to give us on budget night. Still waiting . . . . . four months later.


Read more!

Monday, March 24, 2008

The Week Ahead: March 24, 2008 - Nothing to See Here.

Nothing for the local media to cover this week . . . (Sorry, couldn't resist a snarky comment this morning.)

Monday, March 24, 2008
4:45 PM LANDMARKS COMMISSION MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING ROOM LL-130 MMB
  • Landmarking buildings on the N Pinckney block of the square
5:30 PM PLAN COMMISSION MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING ROOM 201 CCB
  • An amazingly light agenda, again.
7:00 PM COMMUNITY MEETING ON REDEVELOPMENT FOR PLANS FOR THE VILLAGER 2234A S. PARK STREET, THE VILLAGER

Tuesday, March 25, 2008
8:30 AM , 1:00 PM AND 6:30 PM - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION LISTENING SESSION 201 STATE STREET
  • Three chances for the community chance to give feedback on the 3 - 5 year Economic Development Plan
12:00 PM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUBCOMMITTEE ROOM LL-110 MMB
  • The Villager
  • Truman Olson Site
4:30 PM WATER UTILITY BOARD 119 E. OLIN AVENUE, ROOMS A & B
  • Drugs in our water supply?
5:00 PM PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE/MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION ROOM LL-110 MMB
  • Who's getting traffic calming
  • Neighborhood Electric Vehicles
  • Snow
5:30 PM GARVER BUILDING REUSE COMMITTEE MAY GO INTO CLOSED SESSION ROOM LL-120 MMB
  • Arts vs Environment.
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
4:30 PM URBAN DESIGN COMMISSION MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING ROOM LL-110 MMB
  • W Washington Hotel
  • Pinkus McBride Project
5:30 PM BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE ON CLEAN ELECTIONS ROOM 403 CCB
  • Publicly financed campaigns?
6:00 PM COMMUNITY MEETING ON THE FUTURE OF THE TRUMAN OLSON ARMY RESERVE CENTER AT 1402 S. PARK STREET 1602 S. PARK STREET, MADISON LABOR TEMPLE

Thursday, March 27, 2008
1:00 PM WOMEN'S ISSUES COMMITTEE ROOM 523 CCB
  • No agenda available on-line.
2:30 PM CCOC SUBCOMMITTEE TO REVIEW CITY HIRING PRACTICES AND POLICIES ROOM 417 CCB
  • No agenda available on-line.
And, I'm quite certain there are some meetings that will pop up throughout the week.

Read more!

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Local Media Coverage of City Hall

So, is news coverage of local government dying?

Tuesday night it was striking to many that the press row in the back of the room was rather empty. In fact, only two people from radio covered the meeting and that was it. No print media. Which means no Cap Times or WSJ reporters.

Or, is it that the City Council is doing nothing worthy of reporting?

Based on several calls I've gotten from reporters lately, nearly begging for a story to cover, this could be true as well. They keep asking me what is going on? Is the council going to work on anything big? Are we going to do anything newsworthy?

Or, have we spoiled the media?

Some stay home and watch on tv and then call some of us after the meeting for a quote. I have to admit, the Cap Times called me around 11:30 Tuesday night, but I was somewhat irritated with the reporter and the Cap Times and declined comment.

(A little aside . . . . Mary Rathbun was among those who were laid off which I personally think was a mistake. Plus, the call was rather late and I get irritated with reporters who don't show up and then ask you what happened just so they have something to write. It's kind of scary to think that I might be the only source that determines what is news from a meeting and what is not. It used to happen on plan commission quite a bit.)

Anyways, back to my point, It's hard to tell what is going on. I know that more and more as I travel about the city, people tell me that the only source for council news is my blog. I also hear complaints from people anxious to hear about school board and county board news. For city issues, if people want to know what happened they read it here. County Board and School Board are out of luck.

At the same time, the criticism about the Common Council not doing anything is pretty accurate as well. We've failed to address the snow policy issues in any meaningful way this winter and there are single big issues on the horizon. And I have to admit, many of the issues I'm working on are somewhat geeky and wonky, but important. Here's the short list . . . and I have many more ideas in my head . . .
  • Fair hiring policies,
  • Looking at ways to ensure equal pay for women in government
  • Filling city committees with a diverse group of persons - including more women and people of color or with disabilities
  • Opening up the affordable housing trust fund
  • Providing feedback for the rather disappointing economic development plan for the City of Madison
  • Transportation plans for the downtown
  • Revising rules for committees so they are more consistent
  • Revisions to the inclusionary zoning ordinance and salvaging the pathetic housing market study we received
  • TIF policy revisions
  • CDA accountability to the City
  • Trying to figure out what to do about the childcare crisis
I'm not sure what else others might list, but the Long Range Metro report is coming out soon, there's the 311 system report, the security deposit ordinance should be on the next agenda, the billboard ordinance seems to have disappeared and there's a neighborhood electric car ordinance that is somewhat interesting, ALRC is struggling to be more transparent and consistent and there are some issues that are sort of work in progress like the future use of the Garver Feed Mill, Central Park, Madison Public Market, etc but beyond that, its hard to know what others are working on, if anything.

So, is it the media? Is the City Council just boring? Is it a bad combination of the two that is leading to less local news of interest? I'm not sure. But, one thing is sure, the coverage of local government issues is on the decline.

Read more!

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Where will 20,000 plus cars per day go?

So, Gorham Street, from N. Baldwin to N. Livingston is going to be closed or partially closed this summer. Where will all the traffic go? Some in the neighborhood want to experiment with a 2 way Johnson Street with the parking lanes being drive lanes during peak hours. Inbound 6 - 8:30 am, outbound 3:00 - 5:30 pm or something like that. Traffic Engineering opposes it. So, we're going to have a community meeting. Unfortunately, there were no venues in the district available on this short of notice so it will be next Thursday at the Warner Park Community Recreation Center, 1625 Northport Drive.

Here's the full notice:
Neighborhood Meeting
Thursday, March 27, 2008
6:30 p.m.
Warner Park Community Recreation Center
1625 Northport Drive

The City is proposing a project on E Gorham St, from west of N Baldwin St. thru the N. Livingston St. intersection, the main purpose of which is to replace the sanitary sewer main constructed between 1904 and 1906. The project will also include new water main, repair of deteriorated sections of curb and new asphalt surface.

The primary purpose of this meeting is to discuss issues related to managing traffic during construction. Two option being considered. The first is to close the road to through traffic, during construction, with a traffic detour. Closing the roadway to through traffic will shorten the duration of the project and reduce the cost. The second option would allow through traffic through the construction zone. If the roadway is kept open to traffic, the capacity of the roadway will be limited to less than half of the existing capacity, during peak travel times.
What the notice doesn't say is that there is additional work happening on E Gorham from N. Livingston to Butler as well. It's sure to be another summer of messy traffic.
Read more!

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Council Recap: March 18 - Updated

It's somewhat of a mystery to many how we managed to make this meeting last until 10:00. Instead of making a snarky comment about how it happened, I'll let you figure it out as I explain, tho it loses something if you weren't there to experience it. Here's what we did. (Sorry, no links, looks like a city server is down again.)

Mayor Dave, Ald Kerr, Alder Pham-Remmele and Alder Solomon were all missing from the meeting. Solomon and Pham-Remmele were expected, Mayor Dave and Ald. Kerr were both sick. So, with Verveer in the chair and Bruer making the motions, we started the meeting about 5 minutes late.

1. We declared next week Community Development Week.

We went to the consent agenda, passing everything except the public hearing agenda items 3 - 10 and items 27, 28, 32, 33 and 60.

27. Since it wasn't 6:45 yet, we couldn't do public hearings, so item 27 - the Habitat for Humanity project in Larry Palm's district that was a controversy during budget time. Alder Compton brought up the issue, claiming that we didn't have enough information about what Habitat's plan was for the site. After many words, a few questions for staff and adding a few co-sponsors, the item passed, despite Alder Compton's objecitons.

3. It being 7:00 now, we went on to the public hearings. The first item being the demolition ordinance. Only one person was there to testify, neither in support or opposed was Carole Schaeffer from Smart Growth Madison.

a. The first issue we discussed was changing Alder Compton wanting to change 1946 to 1940 for which buildings needed 60 days notice to the neighborhoods when doing a demolition. Since not much was built during WWII I'm not sure it made a difference, and it was accepted unanimously.

b. The second issue we discussed was Alder Rummel making a motion precluding demolition by fire. This sparked (sorry) quite a bit of discussion. After questions of the Fire and Health Department about the effects of the first on surrounding neighbors, and then more "questions" of the Fire Department from Alder Compton and lots of talking, Alder Gruber made a motion to not burn on Clean Air Action Days. Since those days are about ozone issues, not particulate issues we tabled the issue to come up with some appropriate language to properly address the issue.

5 - 7. The next issues were about resurfacing Eastwood and E Gorham. Eastwood was a bit of a controversy as the neighbors would like to see it closed permanently. There was one question about the E Gorham assessments and a little bit of discomfort and laughter as I announced that E Gorham from Butler to where E Johnson and Gorham split at Baldwin will be closed all summer. There was an acknowledgment that while right now people are concerned about potholes, this summer people are going to be wondering how to get from here to there with the near East Side on again, presenting an extra bit of a challenge.

10. We approved moving the Conklin House to 101-109 N Franklin/500 Block of E Mifflin. There was one property owner there in opposition, but we passed the motion without comment. Keep your eye open for a house moving down the street this Sunday.

28. After a few brief questions, we approved double-filling the Department of Civil Rights Director position until Lucia Nunez returns to work.

32. We approved giving a potential homeowner in the Bassett TIF area additional money beyond the program rules because there was a mistake in the brochure. They say there are only two loans that have this problem and we won't have to do this again. There was much concern about the program in general. Giving $60,000 to a homeowner to convert a home from rental to owner-occupied seemed inappropriate to many. It only passed 12 - 5 with Sanborn, Schumacher, Skidmore, Claussius and Konkel voting no. Rhodes-Conway, Rummel, Verveer, Webber, Compton, Cnare, Brandon, Bruer, Clear, Gruber, Judge and Palm voting aye, despite several of them, including Alder Compton expressing concerns about the mistake as well as the program.

33. Fixed some contracting that didn't comply with Best Value Contracting in number 33.

60. Alder Compton had more issues with Habitat for Humanity. This time on the northside. Same objections, same result. We still approved the funding.

It was now about 9:00 and we took a break.

About 9:15 we went back to the tabled demolition ordinance.

c. After some more discussion about demolition by fire. We approved the Gruber amendment restricting burns to days when there isn't a Air Quality Warning or Watch issued by the DNR. Alder Rummel then made another amendment extending the area where people get notice of the burn from 500 to 1000 feet and requiring the developer to pay for the notice. That, after some more bizarre comments from Alder Compton, passed. I attempted to say that you couldn't burn if there were other houses within 500 feet of the proposed burn. That failed.

d. Schumacher then made an amendment, which appeared to be a brokered deal between "the boys" specifically Brandon and Gruber, without talking to me at all. Which I found rather insulting. The amendment allegedly was designed to all more dense urban infill. The amendment was about the proposed future use of the property. The first part said that the proposed future use had to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the neighborhood plan OR (instead of AND) a neighborhood conservation district plan. Theoretically the neighborhood plan and neighborhood conservation district are consistent with the Comp Plan so I'm not sure this did a whole lot. They also changed shall to should. Also, not sure what the legal impact of that was, but probably not much.

The second part of the amendment was to eliminate the sentence that said if no neighborhood plan existed the proposed use had to be "compatible" with the neighborhood character, massing and density.
The stated purpose, as I said, was to provide for more urban infill. Unfortunately, what the boys failed to understand is that the plan commission found that Nolen Shores was compatible with the Bassett neighborhood. So, I'm not sure that was even a necessary sentence after we said that the proposed project had to be compatible with the intent of the zoning classification and the Comprehensive Plan. It seemed to be a huge victory to them when I agreed it could be a friendly amendment, but I'm not sure it will have any real impact.

e. Then, Alder Compton wanted to change the 60 day notice to neighbors and the interested parties register required for buildings built before 1940 to 30 days. After Alder Cnare explained why that notice helped to make the process smoother at the Plan Commission, her amendment failed.

I quickly thanked the Plan Commission subcommittee, most of whom are no longer on the plan commission (myself, Kelly Thompson-Frater and Brian Ohm are all gone, Nan Fey and Jim Boll remain) and staff (Tim Parks and Matt Tucker primarily as well as Ed Ruckreigel from Fire and George Dreckmann from Streets) and explained that the ordinance fixed several issues the plan commission had to deal with including putting teeth into the reuse and recycling plan, allowing some demolitions when we don't know what the proposed use is, allowing demolitions for public safety hazards, better notice to neighbors and other interested parties, clarifying that the ordinance applies to moving houses as well as demolitions, puts the City under the same rules as developers and essentially giving the plan commission better guidelines and the developers more predictability overall. The ordinance passed unanimously and mercifully, the meeting was over and we all needed a drink!

After the meeting, we went the Local Tavern. Joining us were Gruber, Schumacher, Clausius, Clear, Bruer, Rummel, Rhodes-Conway, Webber and . . . drumroll please . . . both Judge and Verveer sans attachments. It's the first time most of us talked to Mike Verveer after the meeting in a very, very long time. Several people ended up doing a food run to the Argus since we missed the menu because our meeting went so long. For entertainment, we made up mixed drinks that described the personalities of our fellow council members. Best not to repeat them here.

Read more!

Progressive Dane - Myth vs. Facts #1 - 3

Much is said about Progressive Dane, about half of it seems to be untrue. Especially if you read a particular blog. So, I've started a new feature - when someone, anyone, promotes lies about Progressive Dane and I see them, I'll try to offer a different perspective - from the point of view of someone who has been a member since 1997 and the co-chair of the party, off and on, for just about as long.

Here's today's offering, compliments of one David Blaska and his Ashok v Thuy blog post.

***************

MYTH: The mayor and a majority of the City Council (minus the Progressive Dane contingent) voted to hire 30 more police officers.

FACT: The actual amendment was proposed by Kerr (not PD), Solomon (not PD), Judge (not PD), Rummel (PD), Konkel (PD)

Delete funding for 12 new police officers and revise Highlight No. 1 to read: Add a total of 18 new police officers with as many as practical to start in the accelerated training academy as quickly as possible. An additional 12 officers may be considered upon completion of the police staffing study currently underway and a long-term fiscal analysis beginning in budget year 2010 by the Comptroller.

The votes went like this, with only 4 of the 6 PD alders voting for it but it got 7 votes.

AYE Judge, Kerr, Konkel (PD), Rhodes-Conway (PD), Rummel (PD), Solomon, Webber (PD)

NO Clear, Cnare, Compton, Gruber (PD), Palm, Pham-Remmele, Sanborn, Schumacher, Skidmore, Verveer (PD), Brandon, Bruer, Clausius.


However, the final votes on the budget, where we ultimately voted for the 30 police officers, not just 18, was 13 - 7 as follows:

AYE Clear, Compton, Gruber (PD), Judge, Kerr, Rhodes-Conway (PD), Rummel (PD), Solomon, Schumacher, Verveer (PD), Webber (PD), Bruer, Clausius.

NO Cnare, Konkel (PD), Palm, Pham-Remmele, Sanborn, Skidmore, Bruer


By my count, 1/3 of the PD alders voted against cutting the number of officers from 30 to 18. 5/6 of the PD alders ultimately voted for the budget with the 30 officers in it. Whatever way you look at it, it is simply not true that "a majority of the Common Council (minus the Progressive Dane Contingent) voted to hire 30 more police officers"

****************

MYTH: The Progressive Dane-liberal coalition that runs the Dane County Board.

FACT: There are 37 members of the County Board. Progressive Dane has 6
  • Barb Vedder, District 2
  • Ashok Kumar, District 5
  • John Hendrick, First Vice-Chair, District 6
  • Al Matano, District 11
  • Chuck Erickson, District 13
  • Kyle Richmond, District 27
To imply that Progressive Dane leads the coalition of liberals on the County Board is absurd. However, it won't stop Mr. Blaska from spewing his twisted truth to try to scare voters during this election season.

***************

MYTH: Progressive Dane operative Megan [sic] McDonell.

FACT: Megin and I had a good laugh about this yesterday. Megin isn't on the Steering Committee or any Progressive Dane committee and by her own admission, hasn't been to a General Membership Meeting in the last three years. Why? Well, she had two sweet little girls and simply doesn't have time. To call her an operative is a tremendous stretch of the truth - unless she's somehow masterminding things between bottles and reading stories to and cleaning up after her kids.

**************

I guess I point these things out to say, don't believe everything you read. And it's not just Blaska, I'll find more examples and point them out. Meanwhile, in case you're wondering, Progressive Dane doesn't own a newspaper, and if we did, we wouldn't have laid off those workers! More to come.

Read more!

Monday, March 17, 2008

When "the City" does Stupid Things

This morning, here's what I found when I came to work . . .

When I drove up, a City of Madison truck was just finishing trimming all the trees (except one) on Few Street. I pulled up to park and saw signs saying I couldn't park there,


so I park in a different spot looked around for more signs. There were none.

I get out of my car, go in the building and get ready to start my day. And then I noticed I didn't have my power cord for my laptop, so I quick ran home and grabbed it. In the process, I took a closer look at the signs.

First I think, what kind of notice is that? Then I started thinking, those signs weren't there yesterday when I was at the building. And so the cars parked there had no chance of complying with the signs if they've been parked there the whole time. So then I wonder, when does the City start giving tickets based on the signs that don't really give good notice and just popped up.

Worse yet, can they give a ticket based on a sign that is facing the wrong way?

Sometimes, it tough to defend "the City" when stupid things like this happen. And even worse, if I get involved I'm micromanaging. Or asking for favors. Or just generally interfering where I shouldn't be. Hmmm, what to do? Close my eyes and hope no one complains to me? Or do something about it and just be a pain to some poor city employee?


Read more!

The "Spring Break" Week Ahead

The week seems a little light, perhaps because so many people are on Spring Break this week.

Monday, March 17, 2008
4:00 PM LONG RANGE METRO TRANSIT PLANNING AD HOC COMMITTEE ROOM LL-110 MMB
4:00 PM TAX INCREMENTAL FINANCING POLICY AD HOC COMMITTEE ROOM LL-130 MMB
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
6:30 PM COMMON COUNCIL ROOM 201 CCB
Thursday, March 20, 2008
12:00 PM HOUSING AFFORDABILITY SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE HOUSING COMMITTEE ROOM LL-110 MMB
4:30 PM LANDLORD AND TENANT ISSUES SUBCOMMITTEE ROOM LL-130 MMB
  • Earnest Money Ordinance provisions

Read more!

Friday, March 14, 2008

Compton and Konkel Together - Also Trouble

Um . . . two in one day? First I agree with Brandon, now Compton? And two different papers reporting these two different agreements?

This can't be. This doesn't fit the frame people try to place me in. I'm supposed to be the person no one can get along with. Next, ya think I can get the Mayor to agree with me on something and then a reporter will report it? The whole world will be upside down!

You can tell the news is slow and they are struggling to find things to write about since the council isn't doing much these days. Typically, the reporters report on disagreements. A typical council agenda can have 200 items on it, and we only discuss ten. And two get written about. That's 1/100th of what we do. So, the 99/100ths of the time that we all agree are ignored and the public doesn't hear about them.

It's not the reporters fault, its the editors. They want the dirt. They want the fights and the drama. That's what sells newspapers. And so, some of us who open our mouths to disagree with others and are passionate about it, make more news and it ends up appearing that all we do is disagree with people. The perception then becomes reality, and people start expecting disagreement or assuming you will disagree.

Fortunately, those who stick around for a while, learn something completely different. There are many more incidents of agreement than disagreement. Nice to see the papers reporting some of the "good" news. Yes, that was a compliment for the media. Happy Friday!

Read more!

Thursday, March 13, 2008

Brandon and Konkel Together

It's a lovefest!

We're doomed.

As most council members know (and love to joke about), when there is a Bradon/Konkel or, ahem, Konkel/Brandon agreement, we usually lose 18 - 2 or 17 - 3. Usually Sanborn, another alder on the TIF committee being our 3rd vote. Rummel also serves on the TIF committee.

Hopefully, when it comes to the TIF policy, we won't have these problems. Sadly, the Mayor (and/or his staff) hasn't (haven't) been paying attention or been talking to the multiple city staff people attending the meetings, so he doesn't know what he thinks about the proposal. That usually spells trouble.

This ought to be interesting.

Read more!

The City's Hiring Process - White Men Do Well.

I've been staring at the 2007 numbers that show where people bomb out of the hiring process for the City of Madison based on race, gender and disability. No data is perfect, and its always a challenge to know how to interpret it without being intimately familiar with the process so you know what the variable might be, but there does seem to be something wrong here.

OVERALL
Overall, out of 4727 applicants in 2007, here's a few numbers that jumped out at me:
White males - 36.11% of the applicants, hired for 46.69% of the jobs.
Meanwhile, Hispanics showed increases, but females in general and Black and Asian males and females did not:
White
Females - 40.36% of the applicants, hired for 37.74% of the jobs.

Black
Males - 5.64% of the applicants, hired for 1.94% of the jobs.
Females - 4.73% of the applicants, hired for 3.5% of the jobs.

Asian
Males - 1.1% of the applicants, hired for .77% of the jobs.
Females - 1.37% of the applicants, hired for .78% of the jobs.

Hispanic
Males - 1.73% of the applicants, hired for 1.94% of the jobs.
Females - 1.77% of the applicants, hired for 2.33% of the jobs.
WRITTEN TEST
The written test seemed to be an area where people did disproportionately well based on race and gender. It makes me wonder if there is something about the way the test are done that impact people in different ways.
White men - 36.11% of the applicants, 20.45% of the people screened out at the written test.
Other numbers that stood out were:
White
Females - 40.36% of the applicants, 56.79% of the people screened out at the written test.

Black
Males - 5.64% of the applicants, 4.32% of the people screened out at the written test.
Females - 4.73% of the applicants, 6.6% of the people screened out at the written test.

Asian
Males - 1.1% of the applicants, .38% of the people screened out at the written test.
Females - 1.37% of the applicants, 1.52% of the people screened out at the written test.

Hispanic
Males - 1.73% of the applicants, 1.14% of the people screened out at the written test.
Females - 1.77% of the applicants, 1.77% of the people screened out at the written test.

CERTIFIED
There were 2507 applicants that were considered for certification of the 4727 applicants. Of those, only 923 were certified.
White males - 36.11% of the applicants, 50.48% of the people certified.
Here's how the rest did:
White
Females - 40.36% of the applicants, 33.26% of the people certified.

Black
Males - 5.64% of the applicants, 3.14% of the people certified.
Females - 4.73% of the applicants, 2.16% of the people certified.

Asian
Males - 1.1% of the applicants, .32% of the people certified.
Females - 1.37% of the applicants, 1.19% of the people certified.

Hispanic
Males - 1.73% of the applicants, 1.62% of the people certified.
Females - 1.77% of the applicants, 1.51% of the people certified.

I'm not sure what is going on. Could it be our education system, our values as a society, biases by individuals or "the system" or problems with our methodologies? Or are white men just better employees?

p.s. The numbers for people with disabilities has a glitch, so I didn't report those numbers here.

Read more!

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Where'd you get that sign?

When I had one of these signs in my yard, I was often asked . . . Where'd you get that sign. Well, here's the answer!

Safe Communities' Annual Slow Down Yard Sign Campaign is April 16 – 25th. We have printed another batch of signs, which will be available for pick up at Madison Police Department precincts after April 10th (and hopefully the snow will be gone by then!)

Yard signs are available free thanks to a grant from American Family Insurance.

We’d sure appreciate your help getting the word out to neighbors - thanks! If you'd like to reserve a quantity of signs for your neighborhood, please return the attached form by April 4th to info@safercommunity.net. We'll set aside signs for you at the Madison Police Department precinct closest to your neighborhood where you can pick them up after April 10th.

For more information, visit www.safercommunity.net.


If you can't find the form elsewhere and need it, feel free to ask me and I'll forward it to you.
Read more!

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Drugged by your tap water?

If anyone besides me is still drinking that tap water . . . you might be interested to know . . .

There is a 3-part series in this week’s Wisconsin State Journal concerning an Associated Press (AP) story on pharmaceuticals and other chemicals that are being found in drinking water supplies across the nation, Europe and Asia. These chemicals can be natural compounds such has human and animal estrogens or synthetic compounds, such as birth control estrogens as well as the full array of hundreds of chemicals contaminants.

Madison Water Utility is aware of this issue and continues to follow the research being conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency, AWWA Research Foundation, the U.S. Geological Survey, the Water Environmental Research Foundation, and other investigators concerning the occurrence and potential health impacts of these compounds. We are not aware of any findings that these trace compounds in drinking water have any impact on human health.

This is not a new issue: there have been studies in Europe and by the U.S. EPA over the last decade regarding the presence of these compounds in surface waters. We do expect that the AP articles will generate further discussion at the federal level regarding the presence of these compounds.

The Water Utility is committed to protecting public health, is paying close attention to the health effects research, and is awaiting guidance from the research and regulatory communities on what compounds to test for and standardized tests for those compounds.

The Utility does not currently test for any pharmaceutical or personal care product, but it does tests for over 130 potential contaminants that may be present in Madison drinking water including,

· 28 inorganic chemicals (iron, manganese, arsenic, lead, antimony, chloride, etc.);
· 41 volatile organic compounds (trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene, etc.);
· 40+ other synthetic organic compounds (pesticides and herbicides);
· 35 other contaminants including additional pesticides and their metabolites, flame retardants, disinfection byproducts, and radioactive contaminants; and

· microbial contaminants including bacteria (E. coli) and viruses.
Although the Utility pumps its water from deep wells, given the length of time that these natural and synthetic compounds have been in the environment, we would not be surprised to find them in the groundwater.

It is also worth noting that the compounds being detected are often measured at a level of a part per trillion or less. One part per trillion is equivalent to a single sand grain in an Olympic size swimming pool. People regularly consume or expose themselves to products containing these compounds in much higher concentrations through medicines, food, and beverages. As testing methods become more sophisticated, contaminants will increasingly be detected at smaller and smaller concentrations. Ongoing research will need to assess the potential impacts of these trace amounts of contaminants in drinking water.

Our science has advanced to the point that we can detect and measure these compounds at these very low levels. But, we do not have the technology to remove all of them from the drinking water or from surface waters.

Finally, the revelation that these compounds are omnipresent in the environment highlights the importance of source water protection, which is a shared responsibility for all in the community. Strategies include the proper abandonment of unused wells, which can serve as conduits for chemicals to contaminate groundwater, and med-drop events such as the very successful one hosted last fall by Public Health Madison and Dane County that will keep unused medicines out of landfills and the wastewater stream.

Although research has not shown human health impacts arising from exposure to pharmaceutical compounds in drinking water, the ongoing conversation should remind us of how valuable our drinking water is and additional steps that need to be taken to protect it from harmful substances.

Larry D. Nelson, P.E.
City Engineer
608.267.4227


Read more!

Hold your breath.

For the next two days.

Or so suggests one of the local kings of sarcasm on one of the neighborhood listserves. Why? The Capitol Times is reporting that the air quality for the next two days is "unhealthy". As Jim Powell from the Madison Environmental Justice Organization points out:
The operative words in this warning is that the air is unhealthy for children, older adults and those with asthma, heart or lung disease (that is MOST PEOPLE). When such a distinction is made (instead of just saying the air is unhealthy, the warning states that only "sensitive groups" need be concerned), it seems to imply that the air is healthy for other people ("healthy" people). How could this be?
Good point. As someone who seems to be constantly struggling with a cough caused by any myriad of things (new unidentified allergies, winter ailments, possible reaction to my medication?) and who lives a block from MG&E, I've been increasingly personally aware of the air I breathe. And the more I become aware, the less aware I wish I was. Its true what they say, ignorance is bliss. First I learned more about the water than I wanted to know, now the air. Great.

And besides, I don't need another excuse not to exercise this morning. I think I'm going to do it anyways and just be careful!

Read more!

Monday, March 10, 2008

The Week Ahead . . . March 10, 2008

In 5 words or less:

The page cannot be displayed.

The links off the clerks website were not working this morning, so I worked off the Legistar version and the list of Additional Meetings. Wasted quite a bit of time trying to figure it out.

Monday, March 10, 2008
4:30 PM BOARD OF ESTIMATES ROOM GR-27 CCB
  • Double filling Lucia Nunez's position for less than 6 month with an outside hire when there are two people currently employed by the City that have been interim directors of that department. Wait, the Mayor has already done this . . . can you say rubber stamp?
  • Is Larry Nelson going somewhere? He currently fills both positions.
  • "The Mayor's" 311.
5:30 PM PLAN COMMISSION MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING ROOM 201 CCB
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
5:00 PM AFFIRMATIVE ACTION COMMISSION ROOM LL-120 MMB
5:00 PM PUBLIC SAFETY REVIEW BOARD ROOM GR-27 CCB
5:00 PM TRANSIT AND PARKING COMMISSION ROOM LL-110 MMB
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
10:30 AM MINORITY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE ROOM LL-130 MMB
  • Review of DCR Hiring Report
2:00 PM CCOC SUBCOMMITTEE TO REVIEW CITY HIRING PRACTICES AND POLICIES ROOM 417 CCB
  • Further determination of what issues we will be making recommendations for.
4:30 Urban Design Commission Room LL-11o MMB
This one is not on the week agenda, but in Legistar. i.e. Not legally noticed at the moment.
6:30 PM BOARD OF PARK COMMISSIONERS 1625 NORTHPORT DRIVE (WPCRC)
Thursday, March 13, 2008
4:30 PM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 330 W. MIFFLIN STREET
5:00 PM BOARD OF EDUCATION COMMON COUNCIL LIAISON COMMITTEE ROOM 103A CCB
  • For an important committee and important topic . . . I don't see much here.
5:00 PM EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES COMMISSION WILL CONVENE INTO CLOSED SESSION ROOM LL-120 MMB
  • Deportation from Dane County Jail report
Friday, March 14, 2008
8:00 AM INCLUSIONARY ZONING ADVISORY OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE ROOM LL-110 MMB
  • Meeting with the City Attorney to figure out what legal action would be necessary to get our money back for the now year late housing study.
12:00 PM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ALLIED DEVELOPMENT SUBCOMMITTEE ROOM LL-110 MMB

Read more!

Friday, March 7, 2008

Hardball.

I had heard about this from a church member, but was surprised and somewhat pleased to see it in the paper. Good churches often do good things quietly and don't get the public kudos that they deserve.

I was even more surprised when my inbox filled up with people commenting about it and urging people to thank the church. It's was good to see advocacy for the homeless from somewhere besides the "usual suspects". I was also pleasantly surprised that the comments connected to the story didn't go to that bad place that so many internet forums can go.

What didn't surprise me was that a few people in the downtown are trying to get rid of the homeless. This has been going on for years and its not just Fred. And when I say "get rid of" I don't mean to help solve homelessness. I mean, move them out of sight and away from where they have to look at "them" and impact their businesses.

So, kudos to the church and kudos to the community for showing support for their efforts.

Finally, I think John Quinlan said it better than I, so I thought I'd share his observations that were sent out to various communities:
There are several things that strike me as particularly ironic here.

One is the fact that a multi-millionaire, whose Dickensian opinions on the plight of the poor and minority people already receive frequent airings in the local media, is invoking the language of the oppressed and voiceless to claim that he had no other choice but to do this in order to be heard.

The second is that he considers it OK to use his power and influence to convince a local church's members to oppose a moral stance taken by that church in the traditions of Christ in defense of the poor.

Third, one might argue that it's his right to end his act of charity in providing a place for church members to park--but wouldn't good professional business practices have dictated that he inform the church of his decision before the church invested in a major building project? While Rev. Schroerlucke of First United Methodist is magnanimous in giving thanks for the 18 years during which Manchester Place management agreed to let church members park in their lot, this was not an act that involved any great sacrifice on Mr. Mohs's part. His parking garage sits empty on Sunday mornings. Perhaps he had the hopes of exerting his leverage in this way all along. Does he not realize that the main impact of his action is to make elderly parishioners walk many blocks in the cold to church? And yet he equates this action with the integrity inherent to standing up for one's beliefs? Who does this man's P.R.?

As a contributor to the Capital Times blog explains, Mr. Mohs lives just a block from the church, and Mohs has stated elsewhere that he had only become aware of the church's use as an overflow shelter in the last month. Doesn't this say something about the lack of significant alleged impact that this use of the church has had on the neighborhood?

In complaining about the alleged concentration of homeless services downtown, Mohs ignores the fact that many of Madison's homeless families are being sheltered at churches all over the city of Madison, thanks to the work of the Interfaith Hospitality Network. And this unnecessary Mohs-generated controversy comes at a time when area agencies working on homeless issues are about to announce new initiatives to address the causes of homelessness on a truly community-wide basis.

People don't move to Madison for "the privilege" of living in a homeless shelter--they move here for the same reason the rest of us do--because of the quality of life here, and the sense of supportive community that makes Madison a special place.

Homelessness is everywhere, but thank goodness for the good people at Madison area churches and the staff and volunteers at Madison area agencies who didn't stand by and watch people freeze to death during this horribly harsh winter, in the alleyways adjacent to the mega-million glass homes of the more fortunate.

Thanks, Atty. Mohs, for putting this all in perspective!

--John Quinlan, for Forward Forum

Read more!

Thursday, March 6, 2008

Now we're cookin'! (For TRC)

How do you think these local judges are going to rate these area chefs with these "secret ingredients"?

Avocado Battle - Mike Jacob, Jim Kellerman, Jacque Pokorney
Cinnamon Battle - Heidi Konkel vs. Mike Quieto
Mushroom Battle - Police Captain Mary Schauf, Tobi Silgman
Turkey Battle - Gary Gorman vs. reigning champion Chris Laurent

Judges
Carousel Bayrd ~ Dane County Supervisor
Andy Heidt ~ Dane County Ombudsman
Vikki Kratz ~ The Isthmus
Mark Pocan ~ State Representative
Mary Rathbun ~ The Capital Times
Lee Rayburn ~ The Mic 92.1
Amy Westra ~ TRC supporter

What's going on?

It’s the sixth annual “cook-off ” hors d’oeuvre competition and Tenant Resource Center Housing Crisis Fund Benefit, 5–7 p.m. at the Cardinal Bar (418 E. Wilson St.).

Many of you know, TRC is in a battle of its own. We lost two major funding sources last year due to politics beyond our control. So, we have to raise an additional $40,000 - $60,000 this year beyond the money we typically raise in addition to some lay offs. However, this fundraiser is typically 100% for our Housing Crisis Fund. What is the Housing Crisis Fund? The Housing Crisis Fund makes small grants to individuals and families who are at risk of losing their housing due to eviction. Grants go to families unable to make a full rent payment—usually because of a temporary loss of income or large unexpected one-time expense. In these difficult times of rapidly increasing housing and utility costs, the Housing Crisis Fund is more important now than ever. We typically get over $1M in requests for these funds, but only have about $20,000 to give out, so the need far outpaces the resources.

So, we have two crises. Fortunately, due to a $5,000 donation, we are able to split the money we raise through this event 50% for the Housing Crisis Fund, 50% for the Tenant Resource Center. Or, if you want, we're flexible, pick your crisis! You can designate your donation any way you want.

So, join us on the 28th at the Cardinal Bar, or you can donate now! On-line! Or give us a call and we can take a credit card over the phone (257-0143). Or . . . the old fashion way. Checks can be made out to Tenant Resource Center at 1202 Williamson St, Suite A, Madison WI 53703. And please, if you see any of our sponsors listed below, tell them thanks!

Can't donate, volunteer! We have a training coming up this Saturday 10 - 6 at the UW campus. Call Megin McDonell for more details. 257-0143.

AND/OR

Please stop on over for the event. Donations at the door as you can afford. No minimums, everyone welcome! Bring your family, co-workers, neighbors and friends. But most importantly bring an empty stomach and judge for yourself! Eat some
great food, mingle, chat and help us raise money for the Tenant Resource Center and our Housing Crisis Fund.

AND

Thank our sponsors!

Madison Gas & Electric

Associated Bank · Sonja Moskalik & Jim Roper · Tim Radelet · Margaux Shields & Jennifer Halsey · Gregg Shimanski · Chuck Smalley · Wegner LLP CPAs and Consultants · Bill White & Kathie Nichols

Mary Anglim · Jen Hitomi Bond · Curt Brink · Dave Cieslewicz · Club TNT – Today Not Tomorrow · Common Wealth Development · Martine Davis · Connie Deer · Ken Golden · Andy Heidt · Michael, Lisa & Corey Jacob · Marsha Mansfield & Steve Schooler · Denise Matyka · Don & Marj Passman · Jacque Pokorney · Mike Quieto · Renaissance Property Group · Rick Richards · Juscha Robinson & Steve Herrick · Vicky Selkowe & Jason Engle · Barbara Smith · Paul Soglin · Brian Solomon · Gary Tipler · Matt Veldran · Voices Newspaper · Dick Wagner · Sue Wallinger & Agustin Olvera · Dace Zeps & Tim Dean

Crystel Anders · Michael & Pamela Barrett · Michael & Sarah Basford · Carousel Bayrd · Brian Benford · Capital City Hues · Carol Carstensen · Nan Cheney · Betty Chewning · Joe Clausius · Jack Clubb · Wendy Cooper · Susan Corrado · Aaron Crandall · Sarah Davis & Heather Schaller · Chuck Erickson · Kathleen Falk · Liz Falk · Marilyn Feil · Dan Guerra · Sheila Guilfoyle · Greta Hansen & Gary Kallas · Kristin Hoffschmidt · Julia Kerr · Austin King · Christine Lidbury · Emmy Lita · Dean Loumos · Jessa Lutz · Leslie McAllister · John Merrill · Eileen Mershart · Rosalie Migas · Ben Nichols · Rainbow Bookstore Cooperative · Faris Rashid · Satya Rhodes-Conway · Dianne
Riley · Erika Schneider · Sarah Shatz · Arlene Silveira · Julie Spears · Vicky Szewczyk · Mike Verveer · Amy Westra · Bill Whitford · Cheryl Wittke · Ledell Zellers

Read more!

Police - Why is timely information so hard to get?

First, a compliment!

The downtown police Captain Mary Schauf and the person assigned to the Tenney Lapham Neighborhood Tim Radke have been WONDERFUL to work with. We get quick responses, proactive helpful information, tips about how to deal with issues, etc. etc. We really appreciate the small things that they have done to keep us connected to our police department. It's a good start on true community policing.

Now, a problem.

One of my issues, and many other alders, for years have been that the police department can send out press releases about incidents that make the news, but somehow, they can't just send the info to the alder when it occurs in their district. All I want is an email when the press release gets sent out. It shouldn't be that hard. Even worse, one of the most absurd things about this was that when I was Council President, they would FAX the press releases TO THE COUNCIL OFFICE. This meant only the Council President got it, likely the next day but it just got placed in our mail box to be seen whenever we checked our mail - which could be days or sometimes even weeks.

We've had meetings with the police department to address this issue, they established a list of crimes that were serious enough to notify the alders and told the police captains to pass the information along. Again, a flawed strategy because the police captains don't work 24/7 and often we still get the information late. However, I'm getting alot more information from my current captain than I ever have before and again, it is so much appreciated.

More recently, I renewed my request with the public information officer Joel Despain. I asked if when he sent out press releases if we could get an email from him. He apparently couldn't make this decision himself and had to ask the higher ups. In typical "higher up" fashion, still waiting for a response. More helpful, but not what I'm looking for, the IT folks said that they could set me up with the RSS feeds that are easily available on the city's website for anyone who knows how to use them - which I had already done. My guess is that about half the alders don't know what an RSS feed is and don't get that info.

Anyways, I don't get it. We have a full time public information officer that has time to write sometimes silly press releases, but we can't get an email. Why? And why has it been 13 days since this was brought to the attention of "higher ups" and I haven't gotten a response?

Finally, another compliment!

(How's that for a compliment sandwich!)
Thanks to Joel Despain, the Public Information Officer and Sarah Edgerton in IT for being so responsive and problem solving. Much appreciated and it didn't go unnoticed!

Read more!

Wednesday, March 5, 2008

Common Council Recap: March 4 2008

28 minutes.

More interesting things happened before and after the meeting than during. Prior to the meeting, Ald. Judy Compton was regaling us with her tales of the olden days. Saving her pennies for her first bike and her first typewriter. Alder Eli Judge remarked how he remembered saving his dollars for his first calculator that could connect on-line. This all started because of Ald. Judy Compton sharing her dumpster diving story about someone throwing away some old documents and Judy finding a City of Madison transportation plan from 1955, complete with lots of roundabouts. Interesting document.

Also, at some point, Alder Compton did her best Marilyn Monroe impression and sang "Happy Birthday" to Alder Rummel. I don't know how it all got started, but clearly, folks were a little punchy last night.

The other pre-meeting buzz was about our new "baby laptops". This week we are exchanging our old laptops and deciding if we made the right choice between the "big" and "baby" laptops. Those of us who chose the small one were particularly pleased. Small, light, convenient to carry and hopefully durable. Makes my "small" laptop look huge. And the Council laptop is small enough I can carry both. Sounds ridiculous, but we can't use city resources for personal/political activities and we can't access city resources (legistar, financial info, software to update our website) from our personal computers. So, we're forced to carry two laptops since we couldn't find a better solution.

Anyways, the meeting started at 6:31. Alders Brandon and Webber were absent/excused. Comments about Favre and Ald. Rhodes-Conway's mom visiting from New York kicked us off. We accepted the letter from our auditor (#1) and moved to the consent agenda. In the 609 pages (hard to believe some people, both left and right, still get printed packets) we only had 4 items we wanted to discuss/refer and three members of the public showed up to discuss a 5th. Two huge projects, passed without a word.

#19 - Alder Rummel questioned why we were appointing people who don't live in the City to City Committees. When we do this, typically people have special knowledges or skills that we can't find elsewhere. I'm not so sure that was the case with the Downtown Coordinating Committee appointment. When questioned, the Mayor's response was sometimes the "best folks we have don't live in the City" and that he's "not a stickler" for having City residents serve on our City committees.
#23 - More concerns about alcohol server license decisions, so it was referred back to the ALRC.
#42 & 66 - Referred back to Board of Public Works to determine if the contractors were in compliance with our Best Value Contracting requirements.
#91 - Recycling at events thanks yous to staff!

Then we went to the public hearings and heard neighbors concerns (for and against) about who pays to fix a water runoff problem on the near west side (#13). Unfortunately, we did what we often do, we didn't discuss or address their concerns, we just voted. We also then passed two pretty big projects - changes to the Hilldale project (#18) and Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery (#17), and placed Kenton Peters project on the Westside (#16) on file because he withdrew his application.

I had predicted the meeting would end at 6:48, and it would have if item #13 hadn't become an issue. We adjourned at 6:59 and after the meeting, we went to the Great Dane to celebrate Marsha's birthday. With the early end time, many went home to enjoy the evening. We were joined by Alders Gruber, Kerr, Soloomon, Clear, Judge, Schumacher, Bruer, Rummel and myself. While several alders spent time talking to the folks from Freed & Associates, the rest of us shared tales of our first political memories and involvements.

Read more!

Tuesday, March 4, 2008

Common Council Economic Development Plan Discussion Recap/Comments

Discussion - sorry, no time for that!

Last night, the following alders attended the "discussion" on the City's Economic Development Plan: Satya Rhodes-Conway, Tim Gruber, Julia Kerr, Judy Compton, Mark Clear, Joe Clausius, Michael Schumacher, Marsha Rummel, Mike Verveer and myself. The "discussion" lasted a little over 2 hours but consisted primarily of a presentation. Alders, in typical fashion, had much to comment on, but were cut off and instead encouraged to send emails with our comments.

DO WE AGREE ON THE GOALS/STRATEGY OF THE PLAN?
After listening to the comments of some of the alders, I think the major issue is that most of us don't buy into the "goals" or as Alder Mark Clear put it the "strategy" of the plan. This was most apparent by the questions of two of my colleagues.

Alder Judy Compton used the Grandview Commons example where we wanted commercial development in the new neighborhood. She wanted the plan to help address how the City could help get small neighborhood businesses, coffee shops, etc into the neighborhood. Unfortunately, the plan doesn't address that issue, because it focuses on "basic sector" jobs, not "non-basic sector" jobs.

Alder Mark Clear wanted to know, "what about small businesses"? The plan, if you look closely, does a little better here. It suggests that staff know where to refer small businesses when they have issues (don't they?) and that we support entrepreneurial efforts. However, all the talk about public/private partnerships clearly focused on large businesses/major players. This prompted Alder Rummel to ask about the Chamber of Commerce and their role and she reminded us all that they had to be forced to create a small business advisory council to keep small businesses involved in the group. The consultant said that he considered the Chamber of Commerce interests to be represented by THRIVE.

ARE WE TARGETING THE RIGHT JOBS TO RAISE OUR MEDIAN INCOME AND BECOME MORE AFFLUENT?
For me, I think several comments during the presentation concern me. First of all, our community, in many aspects, is doing well. One of the "problems" the consultant identified is that we are "not an affluent city". Our Madison median family income is "only slightly above average". Even "worse" is that the median income in Dane County but outside the City of Madison is 34% higher than in the City of Madison. To address this issue, we are going to focus on the "middle and upper points of the job base".

To me, this is all wrong. If our median family income is not high enough, why not work on raising the lowest incomes instead of the highest incomes? Instead, our "best opportunities" that we are focusing on in the plan are to focus on employers we already have here in the areas of
  • Higher Education
  • Technology
  • Health Care
  • Financial Services
  • Advanced Manufacturing
  • State Government
as well as focusing on
  • New entrepreneurial "gazelles"
  • Modest business attraction (if it fits with UW or key companies)
I'm not inspired. In a City where the data shows increases in kids who need "free and reduced lunch", I think we might be focusing on the wrong thing. And we can't dismiss those numbers simply because the federal government redefined the poverty levels so we have less families in poverty. The fact remains, our lower median income is likely because of the numbers of poor people we have in the City of Madison as compared to those who live in Dane County outside the City of Madison and this "plan" doesn't address that.

GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE COZIER WITH BUSINESS?
Another concerns of mine is the "public/private" partnerships that are expected. I had a nice little chuckle when the consultant explained that the business community, through THRIVE does not consider the City a partner, in fact, they push us away and his separate comment that perhaps the business community shouldn't beat the City up so much. And conversely, the City is doing alot and we should communicate that better. But, it's serious. How can you work with a group of people who don't want to work with you and just publicly criticize the government instead? Or, will only participate if they have a special venue?

Additionally, the push to create more "informal" connections in the business community and to consult with them more made me a little queasy. We don't have a good track record of honoring the open meetings laws that we are required to follow when it comes to dealings with businesses and we've gutted our lobbying laws. While I think we generally need more transparency in local government and less favoritism, it seems that this plan pushes us in the opposite direction.

HOW ARE WE GOING TO FUND/ACCOMPLISH ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT?
Lastly, at least for now, the meat of the recommendations is in the set of recommendations that are as follows:

5. Make the City ED Toolkit More Aggressive and Strategic
  • Develop tools to measure fiscal impact, benefit/cost
  • TIF/TID priority to basic sector development creating quality jobs
  • Reexamine development assessment policies
  • Community Development Authority (in public/private partnership) for economic development
  • Encourage neighborhood Business Improvement Districtsa major fatal flaw. It relies on TIF money to fund much of the plan.
  • Create special project development fund ($2.5 mil/yr by 2010)
This is likely a fatal flaw in the plan.
  • TIF
    • We already know that the city isn't willing to create priorities for TIF. Try as I might, a clear set of priorities doesn't seem likely. That would require us to say we aren't going to fund high end condos and I don't think the council has the political will to do that.
    • Even less likely is that the politicos will limit the "flexibility" of the TIF program by taking those clear goals and asking for applications that meet those goals through a competitive process.
    • Even if we can do the above, we still have to show that there is a gap/need for funding these projects and can't just give TIF money away without that fiscal analysis. We are limited by what we can do TIF by state laws that people tend to forget about.
    • We haven't figured out how to make sure that if we give money to build a building to create jobs how to make sure that the business that moves in actually creates the jobs that were promised and/or how to get our money back if the goals are not met.
  • CDA
    • They don't have the expertise (or any staff) to jump into the economic development game.
    • They don't have any money or even a budget that they can share with us.
    • They don't have a clearly stated set of goals that the Council has agreed to.
  • Reexamine development assessment policies? What does that mean?
  • Where are we going to get $2.5 million per year to put into a slush fund for Economic Development when we couldn't fund so many things like staff in the clerk's office?
MISCELLANEOUS/OTHER COMMENTS
I have many more comments that I don't have time to comment on or don't rise to the level of key observations after last night, but here's a list of some other issues:
More to come, I'm sure. If I had this much to say, I wonder what would have happened if the 10 of us who showed up actually got to discuss our concerns.

Read more!

Monday, March 3, 2008

We paid $50,000 for this?

This is what we get for an Economic Development Plan? Seriously? Even the Economic Development Commission didn't think much of it and its complete lack of goals.

To me, all it is is a list of things we are already doing and lot of vague talk about public-private partnerships and communication and how staff needs more training. Oh, and there's an attempt to take more TIF funding and CDBG funding for economic development. The final take away is that we are trying to create jobs to serve people who don't live in Madison.

Seriously? Is that it? Am I missing something? I expected to see a vision of what Madison might look like in 5 - 10 years if we concentrate on economic development. How many more jobs might we have? How might those jobs be different than what we have now? What kind of jobs are we trying to recruit and how will we do it? And how much will it cost?

I really didn't expect to read the plan and hear about how we should revise our TIF policies (currently happening), re-write our zoning code (currently happening), support THRIVE (already happening - but we don't know what we are spending our money on), finish the one-stop shop (already happening), hire staff for the Economic Development Unit (already happening), support programs we are already supporting, etc.

Isn't a plan supposed to be about what we are going to do, not what we are doing? Our staff could have made this list for us in one meeting. Hopefully the consultant will shed some more light on this tonight, because otherwise, its a huge disappointment.

Read more!

The Week Ahead: March 3 2008

Not much exciting this week . . . but here it is . . . but, be sure to check the weekly schedule later in the week, its sure to change.

Monday, March 3, 2008
5:00 PM LONG RANGE METRO TRANSIT PLANNING AD HOC COMMITTEE ROOM LL-130 MMB
  • Hopefully the final recommendations are approved and we will move on to the public hearings on how to improve our bus system over the next few years.
6:00 PM COMMON COUNCIL - DISCUSSION ROOM 201 CCB
  • We'll be discussing the joke of an economic development plan.
Tuesday, March 4, 2008
4:30 PM COMMON COUNCIL ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITTEE ROOM 103A CCB
  • 311
  • Much of the same things we've been talking about, budget process committee, tracking reports, legistar update etc.
6:30 PM COMMON COUNCIL ROOM 201 CCB
Wednesday, March 5, 2008
12:00 PM PERSONNEL BOARD ROOM 501 CCB
  • More "little" changes here and there that impact people's lives in a big way, but for which we have no real vision as far as I can tell.
5:00 PM HOUSING COMMITTEE ROOM LL-110 MMB
5:35 PM COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION ROOM 103A CCB
Thursday, March 6, 2008
5:00 PM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT COMMISSION ROOM 310 CCB
So, there it is, items of interest for the week, until it changes.

Read more!