Friday, February 29, 2008

CDA - No, you can't see our WHEDA application.

During the approval of the Allied Drive project, one of the talking points of the CDA advocates was that they would be far more open and accessible than any private developer. I'm sure I rolled my eyes more than once when they repeated this, but I didn't say anything. I can now give you two reasons to show you how they are not as open and accessible as one might expect.

First, did you know that when they go into closed session, City of Madison alders cannot stay for the closed session unless they are invited by the members of the CDA. Typically, alders are allowed to participate in the discussions of all city committees unless it is a quasi-judicial hearing. However, the CDA is "not the city" when it suits their purposes and "the city" when they need our money. So, they have found a way to exclude even Alders of the City of Madison from their closed session meetings. Just so you know, this never happened, but I did ask the City Attorney about it and that was his answer. I have to say, it makes some sense that we would be excluded when they are negotiating with the City, except that two alders and our staff are all sitting in that same closed session. And it's just hard to let them have it both ways and always whatever benefits them the most.

The second issue, was not something I had thought about. Last night, I asked Stuart Levitan for a copy of the WHEDA application for Allied Drive because I wanted to follow up and see how much they asked for in developer fees as I guess I have the wrong number and I got a somewhat odd response.
If your email constitutes a Public Records request, please direct it to Mark Olinger. thanks
Well, no, it wasn't an open records request. I didn't think I needed to do that. I thought that since the City approved them applying, that I could get a copy. And besides, they are "more open and accessible than any private developer". So I asked why. And I was given a copy of a letter to a report who had asked as well and was denied. Again, there may be some valid reasons for withholding the information, but it sure doesn't match their spin. And again, I guess they are "not the City".

I find it mildly disturbing that an organization that is getting millions of dollars from the City of Madison for the Allied Drive and Villager Mall projects is so . . . "brusque" with the very same people that they expect to fund their plans. I guess I'll have to figure out how to craft some open records requests that can't be denied to find out the information that I want, because I don't think there is any harm in me knowing the answers to the questions that I have. What a ridiculous waste of time.

Read more!

Thursday, February 28, 2008

Trash Parking. Or Parking Trash?

I got home at 10:00 last night. And Rob was parked in the driveway, so I got to drive in circles for a while. After a while, I got a little annoyed as there were many parking spots with no cars in them . . . but not available. Here's what I saw driving 2 blocks down N Franklin, 2 blocks back up N Blair and on the block where I live.

10 Block N Franklin


100 Block N Franklin



100 Block N Blair




All parking is restricted on 10 N Blair due to road construction. Also, the 600 block of E Mifflin has a huge area restricted from parking due to a development that is going up.

This is my own driveway - which leads me to ask, what is the proper trash can etiquette?


What is the proper parking ettiquette in these situations? Sorry, these pictures are more blurry.




In a parking deprived area, with construction, and more or less plowed streets, these cans add yet another source of frustration to living downtown in this already stressful winter.

Read more!

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

Common Council Recap

Last night's council meeting was alot of fixing things that we shouldn't have to do on the floor. Here's what we did.

#1 - Honored our hard working snow removal staff after the long, long winter of way too much snow. This was fixed, we had a new version honoring ALL the staff.

#7 & 12 - Fix - We assigned people as 1st, 2nd etc alternates in the Zoning Committee on the consent agenda.

#17 - Fix - Allowing mayor and city clerk to sign documents for us to accept a grant for the Committee on Clean Elections

#19 - Fix - New fiscal note

#21 & 28 - Fix - the title should have been Economic Revitalization Specialist not the Neighborhood Economic Revitalization Specialist. I voted against it. We essentially have a person who does Community Development and staffs the Community Development Authority who has a name change cuz this position is in the Economic Development Unit instead of the Community Development Unit. And, the position probably belongs in the Community Development Unit. But hey, why let logic get in our way.

#31 - Heh, heh, heh, heh, heh. In this resolution we decided to amend the budget of the CDA. I had to ask, how do we amend something that doesn't exist? I was told that with that "amendment" we were creating it. So, we now have a CDA budget with one item in it, this one. While it took hours and hours of meetings with many staff to figure out how to get a CDA budget, apparently, in one likely mis-statement, we suddenly have what I wanted all along. A CDA budget. I think its kind of a silly mistake, and I can't wait to see how it all works out.

#45 - Fix - It took us so long to pass this that we had to change the report date from March 1 to May 15, but both dates were in the resolution, so we removed the March 1 date.

#47 - The CDA Work Plan probably took the most time. We really need to decide what the CDA is and what our relationship to it is. Good questions were asked about how we set priorities when we do redevelopment districts and they admitted they needed to think about things a little different. They missed their deadline to get the workplan to us, twice. The workplan was due initially in May or June according to the contract that we have with them. In the budget we placed a second deadline of Feb 1 which they technically missed as well. As a result, they should have been billed for all the City staff time they used in 2007 and all of 2008. But . . . since they kinda met it, I introduced an amendment to remove the billing requirement. However, we referred the whole matter so that we could consider their, heh, budget and the workplan together. The budget is due April 1. It will be interesting to see if they meet this deadline.

#48 & #49 - Landmarking the Schubert Building (Badger Office Supplies) & Doris House. An odd moment occurred when Ald. Zach Brandon asked the supporters why they are always landmarking things when development threatens them. The answer is the City doesn't put any money into it and its all done by volunteers. Ald. Julia Kerr sort of thought it was odd he was kind of rude to the citizen volunteers. To which Ald. Brandon responded by having a tiny little fit. He insisted that it was "just a question" and we got a little speech about how the day we couldn't ask questions of people who appear before us was the day . . . oh, I don't know what he was saying. I think he doth protest too much.

#58 - Fix - Despite the fact that the TIF 10% Set Aside Committees elimination has been introduced since 2005, and passed the TIF Subcommittee by a 4-3 vote with Ald Rummel, myself and Tom Hirsch realizing it wasn't ready and Chris Laurent, Dave Gawenda and Ald. Zach Brandon (who missed the entire discussion and abstained until he realized it was a tied vote if he voted) voting with the Chair Tripp Widder . . . it just wasn't soup yet. In fact, it doesn't even make sense. I pointed it out, the Mayor said he agreed and we referred it back to his office to be fixed.

#61 - Should we buy a filter for Well 29? Yes. And thanks to Larry Nelson for the humor.

#62 - Fix - We didn't re-refer the hotel/motel ordinance! We apparently finally came up with a winner. But I want to get paid for work I do for the City Attorney's office. We fixed a bunch of "registration record" issues, removed the requirement that people need a current address on their identification form so that homeless people can rent motel rooms and added language that makes it clear that people renting hotel rooms as the only place where they live have to go through the eviction process and can't just get thrown out without following the eviction laws as required by state law and added some other language that I gave to the clerk. And then it passed unanimously.

#64 - Fix - Kicking people off committees for not doing their statement of interest forms. We did get an updated list at 6:00. We ended up kicking 8 people off city committees for not filing their paperwork. At least one of them intends to stay on the committee and will have to reapply and get reappointed. I half-heartedly tried to refer just that person to the next meeting so that we didn't have to jump through alot of unnecessary hoops, but Ald. Brandon was concerned that "the rules are the rules". And he's right. We ended up having to have a roll call vote on it. I don't know who called it, but the referral failed and he was kicked of the CDBG. Aye (to refer): Rhodes-Conway, Rummel, Sanborn, Verveer, Webber, Cnare, Gruber, Konkel. No (kick him off and make him re-apply): Palm, Pham-Remmele, Schumacher, Skidmore, Solomon, Brandon, Bruer, Clausius, Clear, Compton, Judge

With that, we adjourned, I think at 8:45. Some of us went to the Magnus. Alders Bruer, Schumacher, Clausius, Clear, Konkel, Rummel, Rhodes-Conway and City Attorney Michael May sat at one table. We did not have the pleasure of the companty of Ald. Verveer and Judge who blew us off and sat with their posse at another table. ;)

Read more!

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Brusque professionalism?

Really?

If there ever was a case for community policing, this is it. Is our police department so disconnected from the community that they don't know that a play rehearsal is occurring in the neighborhood?

And what is the "brusque professionalism" of which they speak? Nice spin.

And, why is it they have time to write extra paragraphs about this non-incident but they can't email the alders a copy of the press releases that impact the alders' district?

Why does everything have to be so hard with the police department? Well, not everything. There's some great officers and Captain Schauf is great to work with. Too bad the leadership is so difficult.

By the way, where is that report that we were going to get "tomorrow", after we voted for the additional 30 officers? Still waiting.

Read more!

Monday, February 25, 2008

The Week Ahead and the City Council Meeting

Here's what I find of interest for the week ahead and the Common Council meeting . . . at least, for what is listed now. It's always good to check back later in the week because meetings get added. I'm going to put the whole list here and then note the items of interest.

Monday, February 25, 2008
4:45 PM LANDMARKS COMMISSION ROOM LL-130 MMB
5:00 PM PLAN COMMISSION ROOM 201 CCB
5:15 PM HUMANITARIAN AWARD COMMITTEE - REV DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR ROOM 523 CCB

Tuesday, February 26, 2008
12:00 PM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SUBCOMMITTEE ROOM LL-100 MMB
  • Lots to keep your eye on, its sure to cost us money! Watch your wallet!
12:00 PM PARKING STRATEGIC PLAN, AD HOC COMMITTEE TO DEVELOP ROOM 100 MMB
2:00 PM PRESIDENT'S WORK GROUP ON COUNCIL WEBSITE POLICIES & GUIDELINES ROOM 417 CCB, COUNCIL OFFICE CONFERENCE ROOM
  • Yes, someday the council website, which has been up for over a year now, will actually have bios and other information on it for more than just a few of us.
5:00 PM COMMUNITY GARDENS COMMITTEE ROOM 103A CCB
6:30 PM COMMON COUNCIL ROOM 201 CCB
  • #7 & 12 - Zoning Code Re-write Committee finally getting appointed
  • #21 & 28 - Calling Community Development, Economic Development
  • #31 - Amending the 2008 budget and shelling out more money for the CDA
  • #44 - Council gets quarterly reports on our finances, finally!
  • #45 - Setting up a committee to fix our budget process, finally!
  • #47 - CDA Work Plan
  • #49 - Landmarking the Schubert Building (Badger Office Supplies)
  • #58 - TIF 10% Set Aside Committees eliminated
  • #61 - Should we buy a filter for Well 29?
  • #62 - Re-referring the hotel/motel ordinance, again.
  • #64 - Kicking people off committees for not doing their statement of interest forms (We need an updated report from the clerks office, many of the people on the list have their forms in.)
Wednesday, February 27, 2008
8:00 AM CENTRAL PARK DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION TASK FORCE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING SUBCOMMITTEE ROOM LL-110 MMB
8:00 AM MADISON METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE DISTRICT 1610 MOORLAND ROAD
8:45 AM EARLY CHILDHOOD CARE AND EDUCATION BOARD 2012 FISHER ST
12:01 PM CDA LONG RANGE PLANNING SUBCOMMITTEE HOUSING OPERATIONS DIVSION OFFICE, SUITE 130 - CONFERENCE ROOM
4:30 PM URBAN DESIGN COMMISSION ROOM LL-110 MMB
5:00 PM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 2059 ATWOOD AVE, EVJUE BOARDROOM
  • Presenting the Draft Economic Development Plan for the City - finally getting updated for the first time since the 1980s. (No link because no draft report available.)
5:00 PM PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE/MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION ROOM LL-130 MMB
6:30 PM BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC HEARINGS ROOM 201 CCB

Thursday, February 28, 2008
10:00 AM CCOC SUBCOMMITTEE TO REVIEW CITY HIRING PRACTICES AND POLICIES ROOM 417 CCB
  • This is the canceled meeting from last week.
5:00 PM ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ROOM LL-110 MMB

Friday, February 29, 2008
1:30 PM BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS BID OPENING 1602 EMIL STREET

Also on Friday, the IZ Oversight Committee will be reviewing the draft of the now year late housing study.

Read more!

No lobbyists.

None. Zip. Nada.

Apparently, the City of Madison has no lobbyists this year.

And I'm afraid to even go near the clerk's office and ask to see the reports. Cuz, I will just get an earful about how they don't have time. And they'd be right.

Hmmmm . . . what could we have done to fix that?
Amendment No. 20
Agency/Service: Clerks' Office / Clerk
Page(s): 62
Sponsor(s): Alds. Konkel, Verveer

Add funding of $61,556 for restoration of the Clerk's Office Coordinator position, to work on lobbying, special projects with tracking sunset dates and reports, election official training, bus drivers that help with elections, and legistar oversight

Various $ 6 1,556
Total $ 61,556 Levy Impact: $ 61,556
The clerk's office gets to "share the pain". The Mayor broke the tie. Currently the clerks office has 4 fewer staff people than they had 10 years ago. AYE: Clear, Gruber, Judge, Kerr, Konkel, Rhodes-Conway, Solomon, Verveer, Webber NO: Cnare, Compton, Palm, Pham-Remmele, Sanborn, Schumacher, Skidmore, Brandon, Bruer and Clausius.



Read more!

Friday, February 22, 2008

Pothole and Storm Sewers - YAY!

From the Streets Department:
Hello every one, Here is a update for the weekend being we have no snow in the forecast crews from the City of Madison will have a busy weekend filling potholes and opening up storm sewer inlets. The Engineering Division will have five crews working to open storm sewer inlets on Saturday and Sunday.

Crews working to clear inlets will be concentrating their efforts on areas that had water problems during last weeks rain event. If residents experience any flooding problems over the weekend due to warmer temperatures they should call 266-4665 to report them. This line is to be use to report flooding problems only, not to report blocked inlets.The Streets Division will have 32 people working to fill potholes on Saturday.We are going to concentrate our pothole efforts on main streets such as Mineral Point Rd., Northport-Packers, East Washington Ave, Eastwood Drive and Campus Drive. At this time of year we are only going to be able to use “cold mix” to fill the potholes. This material provides a temporary patch.


Read more!

Can he do that?

Yes. No. Maybe. I'm not sure.

Lucia Nunez, Director of the Department of Civil Right is going to be out of work for 2 months or so, so yesterday, we got the following in an email from the Mayor's Office.
In Lucia's absence, I am naming Larry Studesville as Acting Director of the Department of Civil Rights. Larry is the former Administrative Services Director at the state Department of Workforce Development. He has solid experience as a leader and a manager. Larry will assume the position effective today. I ask that staff and commissioners please help Larry get acclimated to the important mission and issues of the Department of Civil Rights, as he is taking over this role on short notice and without much time with Lucia to transition.
While everyone wishes Lucia a speedy recovery, this email prompted more than one person to ask me, can he do that? What's the authority? I gotta say, I'm not quite sure. I went to the ordinances and this is what I found.

The situation doesn't seem to fall under the "acting appointment" because she is in Comp Group 21 and the leave of absence isn't going to be that long and the person hasn't been out for 30 days and she's not expected to be out for 6 months.
(f) Acting Appointment : An appointment to a position in Compensation Group 17, 18, 43 or 44 which is made to fill a vacancy directly or indirectly created under circumstances when an employee holding a permanent position shall have secured a leave of absence of at least six (6) months duration and/or in the event that such employee shall have been absent because of illness or injury for thirty (30) days and it is reasonable to expect such employee will not return for an additional one hundred fifty (150) days. Such vacancies shall be filled in the same manner as “permanent” position vacancies and employees filling such vacancies shall in all ways be treated as other promoted employees except that such employees shall have the title of “acting” added to their job title. Should the employee in Compensation Group 17, 18, 43 or 44 holding permanent status in the position to which the acting appointment was made return to work in that position, the “acting” employee shall return to the position held prior to the acting appointment andpay and other benefits to that employee shall be as though no promotion to an acting appointment had occurred. In the event that it is determined that the “permanent” employee will not return, the “acting” appointment will automatically become a permanent appointment. (Am. by Ord. 8543, 3-18-85; Renum. by ORD-07-00048, 4-12-07)
And the position requires a "double-fill" since Lucia is still employed by the City, but the Council hasn't approved anything. The ordinances require approvals as follows:
(h) The Human Resources Director, with the approval of the Mayor, and of the Common Council if the action requires the expenditure of more than $2000 and/or is for longer than 30 days, is authorized to double-fill any position for a period not to exceed forty-five (45) calendar days unless such period is extended by action of the Common Council. (Am. by Ord. 9929, 1-11-90; Renum. by ORD-07-00048, 4-12-07)
I asked and I didn't find anything else to guide us in this situation. In fact, I confirmed that nothing really governs this situation. This is what I learned:
Generally the positions we refer to as "Interim" would technically be non-civil service provisional appointments or a non-civil service limited term appointments. I don't believe the term "interim" appears or is in anyway defined in 3.53.

The non-civil service designation comes from the first section of 3.53 where positions are specifically identified as non-civil service and are therefore excluded from the terms of 3.53. The exclusions include essentially all compensation group 21 (Department Head) positions.

A provisional appoint is defined as "An appointment to a position for which there is no eligibility list."

A limited term appointment is defined as "An appointment during a leave of absence of a permanent employee..."

There are no additional rules or restrictions with regard to how provisional or limited term appointments are to be made.


Guess we'll need to fix that. Meanwhile, the double fill ordinance provision should still apply. Right?

Actually, I'm surprised that we're appointing anyone to this position since it is expected to be a short term leave, or that we didn't just take a manager from another department and put them in the position as we have done in the Treasurer's, Park's and Water Utility departments.

I'm not sure anything is actually wrong here, meaning I don't think there is any harm done. I'm just not sure I understand why and when we do things that we do. And I don't clearly see the authority to do this and that concerns me. But I'm more concerned about that lack of transparency that is part of what makes so many people question what we do. Just like the business community, our employees and the public just want some type of predictability and consistency and I can't blame them. I want it too.

Read more!

Thursday, February 21, 2008

Pissed off Water Utility Employees

It's been interesting reading email this morning and to see the water utility employee responses to the Mayor's announcement that they need to start over in finding a new Water Utility Manager. Here's the Mayor's email, followed by the responses we've been getting this morning.

Mayor's Notification to Water Utility Employees:
Despite the hard work and good efforts of the Water Board members, staff, and citizens involved in the hiring process for the Madison Water Utility General Manager, the interview panel members and I jointly came to the conclusion today that we should begin a new recruitment process. This is too important a position to not achieve an outcome that is a win from all perspectives.

I want to thank the members of the written, oral, and staff panels who put a lot of time and effort into the selection process and ask that they again participate in the hiring decision. This was a fair and inclusive process that I would like to employ again.

We will begin placing notices for the position in newspapers and other publications this weekend. We hope to complete the process by early summer and have someone on board soon thereafter.

I am very pleased to report that Larry Nelson has agreed to stay on as Interim General Manager until the position is filled. I want to sincerely thank him for his steady hand and leadership. I also want to thank the staff and members of the board. I appreciate their patience and dedication to the City of Madison during what I know has been a long transition.

Mayor Dave Cieslewicz
210 Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd., Room 403
Madison, WI 53703
608.266.4611
mayor@cityofmadison.com
The staff responses:
Dear Mr Mayor

Let me share with you my sincere and heartfelt disappointment in you and your staff regarding the choosing of the next Gen Mgr for the Madison Water Utility.

Another low expectation has been met. I am truly underwhelmed.

You win. Thanks so much.

**********

Another sign of lack of communication. How come employees had to find out about this thru news media first? Releasing an e-mail to us at 4:22pm - when most employees are done working by 4:00 -- come on!

***********

Dear Mr. Mayor,

Once again communication is a problem. Because of the nature of our business, most of us start early to accommodate our customers and are done before 4:22 when your E-mail was sent. It was quite a shock to hear it on the 10:00 news. I did find out this morning that the managers new of this but were told not to tell the employees. What's up with that? I am really disappointed once again.

***********

Good Morning:

One of the things the Water Utility has been faulted for was a lack of communication, both internal and external. However, It appears that the Water Utility is not the only agency that has this issue. Imagine my shock to open this morning's WSJ and read the headlines in the local section, "Search to start anew for water head." Even though a mayoral message was sent yesterday, it was sent at 4:22 when most of the employees have already left. Since this has such a direct impact on the employees of the Water Utility, would it have been too much to ask for us to have received this information in a timely manner from the mayor instead of from the news media?

Personally, I have spent much time and energy as part of the Steering Team trying to implement the Strategy Plan that was developed from our self-assessment. I believe the Steering Team has been, and continues to be, involved in being a successful guide in setting achievements for the Water Utility. The employees are making an effort to rectify problems and re-establish confidence in the Water Utility. Please give us the courtesy and respect of talking to us directly and not thru the media.
I'd call these responses highly unusual. And, remarkable in that these people all signed their names to their emails and sent them quite publicly. They must be experiencing a high level of frustration to have written those emails. Another tough place to be working these days . . . Treasurer, Clerk, Water Utility . . .just the tip of the iceberg? I keep hearing rumblings and I can't tell if people tell me cuz they know I will listen, or if things are getting worse.


Read more!

Women in Local Government

This is an interesting study. Well, at least it is to me!

The study has the following key findings:
  • Statewide, women make up about 29 percent of elected and high-level appointed offices in federal, state, tribal, county, city and school district governments in Wisconsin, but only about 10 percent of leadership positions such as mayor, council president and county board chair.
  • Among elected governing (policy) bodies, women make up about 18% of County Board members, 19% of City Council members and 37% of School Board members.
  • Women make up 70 to 90 percent of elected (administrative) offices such as Clerk, Treasurer, Clerk of the Courts and Register of Deeds – except in Wisconsin's largest counties where men are up to three times more likely to hold these positions.
  • The number of women serving as Mayors of Wisconsin cities increased from 18 in 2005 to 21 in 2007. Though the net increase is small, there has been increased activity in women seeking the office of mayor.
  • Many communities still have no women in local government. Thirty-nine of the 190 cities in Wisconsin (21 percent) have no women City Council members, including the City of Milwaukee. Combined, about nine percent of Wisconsin's county boards, city councils and school districts have no women members—representing over one million Wisconsin residents.
  • When it comes to leadership, size matters. Governing bodies with a greater share of women members are significantly more likely to have women in the top leadership positions. Among city councils and school boards, for example, the likelihood of having a female board president increases markedly only when women hold 40 percent or more of a board's seats.

Read more!

Coal - Your input needed tonight!

Here's the official notice:
NOTICE OF TOWN HALL MEETING
Thursday, February 21, 2008
5:00 to 8:00 p.m.
GEF 2, Room G 09
101 South Webster Street
Madison, Wisconsin
Public Invited to Help Develop the Scope of the Study of State-Owned Power Plants in Madison

The Wisconsin Department of Administration and the University of Wisconsin invite citizens to a town hall meeting to help develop the scope for a comprehensive feasibility study to analyze the way the state heats and cools state agency buildings and the U.W. campus in Madison.

Last November the Department of Administration and the University of Wisconsin entered into agreements with the Department of Natural Resources and the Sierra Club to complete a feasibility study on the Charter Street Heating Plant and other power plants in Madison. The agreements were filed with the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin (Case Number 07-C-0251).

The state-owned power plants include the Charter Street Heating Plant, the Walnut Street Heating Plant, the West Campus Cogeneration Facility and the Capitol Heat & Power Plant. MGE’s Blount Street Plant will also be considered in the study. The state-owned facilities mainly provide steam to heat and cool state agency buildings and the UW campus in Madison.

The public is invited to provide input and help develop the scope of the study. The town hall meeting will include a formal presentation, displays regarding different options and an open forum for the public to provide comments. The agenda is as follows:
5:00 Self-guided Review of Displays
5:45 Informational Presentation
6:00 Open Forum
7:00 Revisit Displays

Read more!

Hiring: What are we doing wrong?

So, once again, our hiring process ends by making news. This time, because after 6 months we have to start over with the hire of a new Water Utility Manager. As usual, I don't know any of the details, but I heard comments earlier on in the process that none of our internal employees who applied had even gotten an interview, maybe it will be different this next time around?

Add this latest to the City Treasurer quiting after less than 3 months which lead us to hiring an interim Assessor/Treasure, our interim IT/Parks Manager, the Interim Appointment of a Mayoral Aide to Community Services, the questionable hiring of another Mayoral Aide for our Facilities Manager, the Bill Clingan hiring fiasco, and the City Clerk/Treasurer failed hire and we have a pattern of problems. It once again, calls into question our outdated policies, the wages we pay, our recruitment procedures, our decision making process used to decide who's resumes make it to the next step and how we choose our finalists.

It seems that we need to deal with these issues sooner rather than later. Too bad the clerk's office was too busy to let us meet this week. We have some good reports from staff and the Madison Professional Supervisory Employees Association (MPSEA) to review.

Read more!

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

How many million will this cost us?

Every once in a while you read something in the paper, and you can just see it coming. I wonder how much the bill to the taxpayers is going to be this time. Will this be another Broadway/Simpson or Allied Drive scenario where we dump millions of dollars into an area to displace the people who live there and create another low income neighborhood somewhere else and then get told we need to spend millions more? And how many more times are we going to do this before we get it right?

Lines in the article that sound like they are going to cost us are:
Ald. Tim Bruer, 14th District, who represents the area, also vowed a comprehensive housing strategy involving improvements to rental units, more homeownership and new senior housing.

The housing strategy "has to happen in the next 90 days, " Bruer said, adding that the plan will dovetail with other moves, such as the city 's redevelopment of the nearby, worn Villager Mall on South Park Street.

and
The city is beginning drug abatement actions on those buildings, which can lead to city takeover of those properties, he said.

and
What 's also needed, he said, is more police presence on the streets, a reduction of old housing stock and a new approach by social-service agencies that support continuous dependency.

The city 's most successful efforts to attack crime in neighborhoods have always involved residents and responsible landlords working closely with police, Wray said. But a reduction in density has helped in the Allied Drive and Lake Point Drive areas, he said.

The city can use a redevelopment approach similar to the one that has revitalized the Lake Point Drive area, but on a smaller scale, Bruer said.

Here we go again, get out the checkbook. And, did you ever notice, we shove density downtown, complain about how many drinkers are concentrated in that area and how many police resources it takes and then simultaneously reduce density in other areas of the City as a solution to policing problems. What are we doing? Can't we start learning from our mistakes?

Read more!

New Meetings, Not on the Schedule as of Sunday

Looking at the Weekly Schedule has become something you need to do every day, since many notices of meetings are not up a week in advance. Technically, they only need to be up 24 (workday) hours in advance of a meeting. However, I always thought we tried to have more notice for the public, but that seems to be slipping. When we give late notice, and then no one shows up to the meetings and then when people get upset they show up to the council meeting and we wonder why they are getting involved so late in the game . . . well, isn't it obvious? How many people do you know that check the weekly schedule daily? And then, even if they find a meeting they are interested in, how many people have time available on short notice?

Also, it seems to me that we made a HUGE mistake last year in the budget when we didn't give the clerk's office more staff. The clerk's office has 4 fewer staff than they had 10 years ago. We could have voted to give them more staff, but we didn't. Here's how we voted: AYE: Clear, Gruber, Judge, Kerr, Konkel, Rhodes-Conway, Solomon, Verveer, Webber NO: Cnare, Compton, Palm, Pham-Remmele, Sanborn, Schumacher, Skidmore, Brandon, Bruer and Clausius. The Mayor broke the tie and the position was not funded.

So, subsequently, things like this happen:
Canceled: CCOC Subcommittee to Review City Hiring Practices & Policies. The Clerk's Office was not able to post this meeting in time for tomorrow (10:00 a.m. 2/20/08). The meeting is canceled.

When I asked why, this is what I was emailed through various staff:
Sorry Lisa. I have hardly had one minute to even glance at meetings and of course, as you know, Helen is working out in the field all day for the election. I am not sure what is happening with this committee. I think I cancelled it at the original time. If the agenda is the same as the one for the original meeting, does that mean the rescheduled meeting is timely posted? The phones are ringing off the hook and I'm still not sure I can get things updated. Can you explain this to me? Is this a cancellation or a reschedule and is it within the 24 hour requirement or not?

If we had more staff, maybe they could have figured this out in time for the meeting to occur.

The other somewhat aggravating thing is that the Board of Estimates usually puts their agenda out on Friday, around 3:30, so you find out on Friday afternoon if you have to go to a meeting on Monday. The Council and Plan commission used to do the same thing, but they've backed their schedule up one full day, and we typically get those agendas on Thursday's now and its a big help. It makes it alot easier for people to ask questions of staff before the meeting if you have more than one work day to do it. If you get things on Thursday you can look at it Thursday night and get questions to staff for them to answer on Friday, instead of reading it on the weekend and getting and answer on Monday that you may or may not have time to even read.

For what it is worth, here's the meetings that have been scheduled since my Monday morning blog, a mere 48 hours ago. Some of them are because of last minute scheduling, some were mistakes, some were staff outside of the clerks office, I just hope there weren't others that didn't get noticed:
Wednesday, February 20, 2008
10:00 AM STREET USE STAFF TEAM ROOM 108 CCB
5:30 PM ALCOHOL LICENSE REVIEW COMMITTEE GR-27 CCB

Friday, February 22, 2008
12:00 PM HOUSING AFFORDABILITY SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE HOUSING COMMISSION ROOM LL-130 MMB

Saturday, February 23, 2008
9:00 AM 201 STATE FOUNDATION INC BOARD OF DIRECTORS SPECIAL MEETING 201 STATE STREET, PROMENADE LOUNGE


Read more!

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

To vote, or not to vote.

I decided not. That's right, I didn't vote today. I have one hour to change my mind, but I don't think I will. I've been agonizing over what to do for about a week. I decided, and waffled, and decided again, not to vote. It seems so wrong to not vote. Unamerican. Unpatriotic. Like I wasn't doing my civic duty. And yet, it was the right thing to do. I even ruined by flawless voting record of over a decade. But I just couldn't vote today.

You see, I'm not a Democrat. I'm certainly not a Republican. I'm a Green. And in Wisconsin, the Greens didn't have a primary today. We are voting in Wisconsin by mail. And there wasn't anything else on the ballot. So, I'll vote in the Green primary, by mail, when my ballot comes. It just didn't seem fair to vote in both the Democratic and the Green Party primaries. To tell you the truth, I couldn't make up my mind about which Democrat I would want to vote for. The more I thought about it, the more it became clear, I couldn't get excited about voting for either of them, because . . . well, they are Democrats. And while either would be better than Bush, I wasn't excited about what either of them have to say. As I noted in an earlier blog, Edwards said the things I wanted to hear, and I probably would have voted for him had I voted in the Democratic primary. . . but that just got me back to . . . why would I vote then? I got lots of suggestions from people urging me to vote and justifying why I should, but nothing convinced me. Why should I tell Democratic Party delegates how to vote? I shouldn't. So, as crazy as it sounds, especially for a local politician, I can proudly say . . . I didn't vote today.

Read more!

How to NOT get something done.

Snow. You'd think it might be a priority issue. You'd think.

Last December, Alders Rummel, Rhodes-Conway and myself sent out a press release with some ideas about fixing some of the snow problems. Chief among them were good notification to people who live in the Snow Emergency Zone (SEZ). We had a meeting last December. It was several hours and there were about 15 staff people and alders there and we talked about many ideas. Just talked.

I wanted to introduce two minor ordinance to clarify some rules. I was asked to hold off until we had more meetings and discussed things further. I agreed. And waited, and waited and waited. We had one more meeting in January, to discuss a very narrow list of issues. That meeting went well. Meanwhile, the Mayor's office introduced an ordinance - which I thought we agreed we'd hold off and work together. The proposal is a bit unclear to me, but it allows additional towing (which we are already doing), and doubles the fines for downtown residents. It also expands the street sweeping parking restrictions to year round instead of May - Nov. This proposal got referred again last night at the Board of Estimates, where I was led to believe we were going to discuss the proposal. At the meeting we were told we would discuss it further on the 29th.

The meeting on the 29th was where we were going discuss how to better notify the public when they have to move their cars. Since it doesn't seem to be very consistent when we declare a snow emergency and the way they notify the public relies heavily on people watching the evening news or listening to the radio.

Well, turns out, there's a major flaw in that plan. The staff person who is in charge of the public notification can't be there. So, the meeting will likely be rescheduled.

You think we can get it together and figure this out before next year?

Read more!

Text Messages and Chats/IM not open records?

I gotta be missing something. Last week, the Badger Herald reported that the Mayor and Alder Zach Brandon want to make it so that text messages and instant messages/chats are not subject to open records laws. Their justification seems to be that the records are not "permanent" and not easy to capture. I haven't seen the proposal yet and I hesitate to put too much trust in the student paper to get the facts correct, so I talked to Bill Lueders to find out what was going on. And what I heard was more than a little disturbing. It sounds like a HUGE loophole is being blown in to the open records law based on FORM not SUBSTANCE. Why would we do that?

Now, I might be a little more anal about this than other elected officials, but I have text messages saved on my phone that are over a year old. I save them because I consider them a record about substance that could be subject to open records laws. And, my chats on gmail are all saved. How are these not "permanent records" and why should they be exempt from open records since they seem to be the same as emails to me?

I didn't save all my text messages, only the ones that seemed like they were relevant to being an elected official, so the "i'm here, where are you?" and "i'm running late" and "what's for dinner?" type text messages are deleted. However, I saved the following, the first one was from 2006:
Zach Brandon (10/5 10:59 am): The lack of city Economic Development is my fault? That's precious. I guess the truce is over. Fine with me, but don't go running to the Mayor is time.
Me (10/5 12:18 pm): Always the victim aren't you . . . I didn't even mention your name . .. geeesh . . .

******

Me (2/7 10:09 am): Would you have voted to put housing in with ecd and make it its own dept?
Zach Brandon (2/7 6:08 pm): Probably... Devil is in the detail.
Me (2/7 6:09 pm): always

******

Zach Brandon (10/24 7:51 am): Have you talked to verveer and satya RE: splitting the econ dev/comm dev position?

******

Me (11/9 10:36 am): I have to cuts to the budget without seconds . . . . Interested? Please call.
Zach Brandon (11/9 11:16 am): Stuck in a meeting... What's up?
Me (11/9 11:18 am): never mind . . . Got it covered . . . Was going to ask you to sponsor some cuts that I didn't have a second for . . . But I got em.
Zach Brandon (11/9 11:30 am): Ok. Sorry. Let me know what they are.

******

Me (11/27 5:01 pm): So who wants to be on this committee?
Zach Brandon (11/27 5:02 pm): Me and you.. LOL
Me (11/27 5:02 pm): :) and who else?
Zach Brandon (11/27 5:10 pm): Don't really know... Guessing: me, you, ms, src, mc, mv(???)...
Shouldn't most/all of these be subject to open records laws? You can do alot by chat and text messages that should be open to the public and exempting these types of communications seems to be leaving a big gaping hole in the law. If this ordinance passed, why bother with email if you can text or chat? Seems to me, that is not something we should be encouraging. I'm even more concerned after re-reading the Attorney General's guidance (page 35 & 36) on these issues, and confirming that it is the CONTENT that makes something a record, not the FORM:
X. Electronic Records

A. Introduction: General principles apply to records in electronic format, but unique or unresolved problems relating to storage, retention, and access abound.

1. The public records law defines the term “record” broadly to include “any material on which written, drawn, printed, spoken, visual or electromagnetic information is recorded or preserved, regardless of physical form or characteristics, which has been created or is being kept by an authority.” Wis. Stat. § 19.32(2). See Section IV.A., above.

2. Because the content or substance of information contained in a document determines whether it is a “record” or not, id., information concerning public access set forth in the remainder of this outline generally applies. However, many questions unique to electronic records have not yet been addressed by the public records statute itself, by published court decisions, or by opinions
of the Attorney General.

B. Is electronically stored information a “record” within the meaning of the public records law?

1. Generally, yes: so long as recorded information is created or kept in connection with official business, Youmans, 28 Wis. 2d at 679, the substance, not the format, controls whether it is a record or not.

a. Examples of electronic records within the Wis. Stat. § 19.32(2) definition can include word processing documents, database files, e-mail correspondence, web-based information, PowerPoint presentations, and audio and video recordings, although access may be restricted pursuant to statutory or court-recognized exceptions, see Section VIII., above.

b. Wisconsin Stat. § 16.61, which governs retention, preservation, and disposition of state public records, includes “electronically formatted documents” in its definition of public records.
Like I said, what am I missing? If a record can be kept, why not keep it? Just because it can be deleted, should we? Or shouldn't we be encouraging people to keep those records instead of destroying them?

Don't get me wrong, we need to discuss these issues and address what I see a many problems with open records, but to me the bigger issue is, shouldn't the City be providing us a way to store these records and back up the records on our laptops?

Read more!

Monday, February 18, 2008

Snow. &*^%$! Snow.

I'm so sick of the snow I can hardly do another post about it. Apparently, according to Channel 3, out of the last 80 days, it has snowed 54 days or 68% of the days. We've gotten over 80 inches of snow this year and more is on the way. And yet, yesterday, we broke the record for the most RAIN on that date. It took me about a half hour to scrape the ice off my windows last night and get my frozen car door open. Only 32 more days until spring.

Yesterday Madison Metro canceled all service, streets flooded, the Presidential campaigns scrambled to reschedule their events, the County and City asked us to stay off the roads and Paul Soglin live-blogged the storm. Today, most of us try to go to work. Downtown it doesn't look like we got three inches of snow, so many people didn't move their cars, likely thinking that it wasn't a snow emergency, but it was. So, I'm sure the "snow emergency" news and the plowing /narrowing of the streets downtown isn't going to be good.

Here's the latest from the snow weary Al Schumacher from the Streets Department:
I was wrong in my pessimistic outlook at the plowing times during the overnight. Because the majority of accumulation ended by 8:00 pm last night we were able to start our plowing of residential streets earlier than originally planned. As a result, almost all of our residential streets are plowed by now and we should be totally finished by 8:00 am or so.

We have started salting our main arterials again in the hopes of breaking some of the bond that the freezing rain, rain, snow and falling temperatures created.

We received over 1" of freezing rain and rain yesterday which caused our side streets to become ice rinks. Kudos should be sent to Kathy Cryan from City Engineering for orchestrating the clogged storm inlets response that included crews from Engineering, Water Utility, Forestry and Streets. The snow on top of that certainly didn't help. However, traffic should be able to travel with little difficulty this morning. We are hoping the salt works today and the afternoon rush will be better.

I expect you are going to hear complaints about snow and ice boulders in peoples driveways again. The wet, rain soaked snow rolled into boulders again as it was plowed to the curb much like what occurred back in early December. We certainly don't do that on purpose but it is one of the side effects of plowing wet snow.

We did ticket and tow again last night in areas in and outside the SEZ.

This was the 13th full scale plowing operation of the season, (we normally perform 5 in a season).
This is the 6th plowing of 2008 and we have the rest of this winter and next November and December left.
Since Dec 1st, it has now snowed on 44 days of the 80 for 55% of the days.
We are over 83" for the year. (previous seasonal record was 76.1" in 1978-1979.

On a positive note, the normal high for today is suupposed to be 32. We are inching closer toward spring.

I hope I don't have to take up your time in the near future with another storm report or update.

Al

Read more!

That Poor City Treasurer's Office

I think its been years since they have had someone permanently (for more than 3 months) in charge in the office. Here's the latest interim solution from the Mayor's office sent out last Thursday.

I am appointing City Assessor Mark Hanson as Interim City Treasurer until a permanent replacement is hired. Mark will be taking on these duties while retaining his already substantial responsibilities as City Assessor. I very much appreciate Mark's willingness to take on this role, as well as the assistance that I know JoAnn Terasa will be providing.

I would also like to recognize the contributions of the City Treasurer's Office staff. I appreciate their patience and dedication to the City of Madison during what I know has been a difficult transition.


At least its not as odd at the IT Director being in charge of Parks. A little history, when Ray Fisher retired (2006), they tried to hire a Clerk/Treasurer, that didn't work out so well. So then they finally hired Gerald Pace, who lasted less than three months. Now, we start over again. A good summary is here. Interesting that the Mayor chose a different person to be interim treasurer this time. What does an Assessor know about being a City Treasurer?

Read more!

The Week Ahead: February 18, 2008

This is the weekly schedule at the moment, somehow, I'm guessing, that once again, its going to change.

Monday, February 18, 2008
4:00 PM LONG RANGE METRO TRANSIT PLANNING AD HOC COMMITTEE ROOM LL-110 MMB
4:30 PM BOARD OF ESTIMATES ROOM GR-27 CCB
4:45 PM COMMISSION ON THE ENVIRONMENT ROOM 108 CCB
  • Discussion plastic bag bans (There are some links to some memos from George Dreckmann and the City Attorney's office that you might want to take a peek at on the agenda. Note, at the moment, there is no proposal and no Alder who has said they will sponsor anything.)
Tuesday, February 19, 2008
Most meetings are canceled due to the primary elections.

Wednesday, February 20, 2008
Nothing of interest currently on the agenda. However, I know I have a meeting about hiring practices that is not yet on the agenda.

Thursday, February 21, 2008
3:00 PM EMPLOYMENT SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE ALLIED TASK FORCE ROOM LL-120 MMB
  • Might be of interest, but we don't have an agenda available
4:30 PM LANDLORD AND TENANT ISSUES SUBCOMMITTEE ROOM LL-130 MMB
  • Not much on the agenda of substance, mostly discussion on things like landlords who don't do repairs and possibly licensing landlords. I'm just struggling to find things of interest for this week.
5:00 PM LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING COMMISSION ROOM LL-110 MMB
  • The update on transportation projects is always interesting to me. That's something that should be televised as I think many people would find it interesting.
Since I didn't find much of interest, here's the total list of meetings at the moment. I'll be interested in seeing how much this changes throughout the week. You can check back here to find out more throughout the week:

Monday, February 18, 2008
8:00 AM CENTRAL PARK DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION TASK FORCE CONCEPT PLAN SUBCOMMITTEE ROOM LL-130 MMB
4:00 PM LONG RANGE METRO TRANSIT PLANNING AD HOC COMMITTEE ROOM LL-110 MMB
4:30 PM BOARD OF ESTIMATES ROOM GR-27 CCB
4:45 PM COMMISSION ON THE ENVIRONMENT ROOM 108 CCB
5:00 PM CPD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ROOM LL-120 MMB

Tuesday, February 19, 2008
4:00 PM OLBRICH BOTANICAL SOCIETY BOARD OF DIRECTORS 3330 ATWOOD AVENUE

Wednesday, February 20, 2008
8:00 AM CENTRAL PARK DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION TASK FORCE ROOM LL-110 MMB
1:40 PM SENIOR CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE 330 W. MIFFLIN STREET
4:30 PM BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS ROOM 108 CCB
4:30 PM PLATINUM BIKING CITY PLANNING COMMITTEE ROOM 100 MMB
6:30 PM BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC HEARING ROOM 201 CCB

Thursday, February 21, 2008
3:00 PM EMPLOYMENT SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE ALLIED TASK FORCE ROOM LL-120 MMB
4:00 PM MONONA TERRACE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FINANCE COMMITTEE ONE JOHN NOLEN DRIVE, DANE ROOM
4:30 PM LANDLORD AND TENANT ISSUES SUBCOMMITTEE ROOM LL-130 MMB
4:30 PM MONONA TERRACE COMMUNITY AND CONVENTION CENTER BOARD ONE JOHN NOLEN DRIVE, HALL OF FAME
5:00 PM LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING COMMISSION ROOM LL-110 MMB
5:30 PM DOWNTOWN COORDINATING COMMITTEE ROOM 108 CCB
5:30 PM GARVER BUILDING REUSE COMMITTEE 3330 ATWOOD AVENUE
6:30 PM CCOC SISTER CITIES GRANT REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE ROOM 417 CCB

Read more!

Saturday, February 16, 2008

Where will the snow go?

According to Al Schumacher, the Streets Superintendent . . . in your driveway. Here's his note:
We are expected to get blasted with 6"-12'" of heavy, wet snow with some freezing rain possible when it starts tonight after midnight. Snow is expected to last all day Sunday. It is not supposed to end until late Sunday night into Monday morning.

This will be a very trying snow storm to say the least. Our streets will get more narrow than they are now because there is no place for the snow to go. The snow banks are higher than the plows so the snow will just fall back into the street when we plow it narrowing our streets even further. Another side effect of having snow banks this tall is that more snow will stay on the plows and end up filling the driveways. It has to go somewhere and if it can't fall off on the terraces, it will fall off at the driveways.

This will not be quick cleanup either. Once we start plowing residential streets, I expect it to take a lot longer than the normal 10-12 hours because of the amount of snow and the fact that it will be wet and heavy. Extra cuts will have to be made in order to move all the weight.

More to come when more plans are made and the storm is actually upon us.

Read more!

Friday, February 15, 2008

What Should the Future of Coal in Downtown Madison Be?

Is your grey house actually white? Recently developed breathing issues you never had before? Often wonder what those smoke stacks are spewing into the air you and your family breathe? Here's some info recently forwarded to me I thought you might be interested in.

Moving Beyond Coal!
(More info and fact sheets available at http://www.4lakes.org/campaigns.htm)

Thursday Feb 21, GEFII Building, 101 S Webster, 5 PM
Tired of coal on the Isthmus? We have a a wonderful opportunity to shape our energy future. Right now we are in the process of figuring out the best options to replace the three dirty coal-fired power plants in downtown Madison - and you can help!

Please join us for the first Town Hall meeting where the City of Madison, Dane County, the State of Wisconsin, the University of Wisconsin and Madison Gas and Electric are all looking for our input -- BEFORE they propose a new plant. It's a great opportunity! Attend the feasibility hearing on how we'll provide energy for the Isthmus and beyond. The consultants on this study are looking for YOUR feedback on alternatives for powering the Isthmus and campus. An overwhelming response could have a HUGE effect!
For more information, contact Seth Nowak at coop_seth@yahoo.com, or call 257-4994.
Tuesday, Feb 26, Madison City County Bldg, MLK Dr., Room 201, 7 PM
We're getting close and expect a vote on the Energy Efficiency and Safety Ordinance. Please contact you alderperson to ask him/her to support the ordinance, and then show up on 2/26 to voice your support. For more information, contact Jennifer at 257-4994.

Support Clean Energy
Are you a MG&E customer? Is 100% of your electric power coming from a clean, renewable energy source? For a mere 1 cent per kilowatt hour, all your electric power can be wind generated. To sign up, go to https://www.mge.com/my_mge/ServiceForms/WindPowerRes.htm. And you'll not only be using clean energy, you'll be setting a good example and helping support more wind or other renewable power in the future.

Read more!

Water Quality Update

Here's the latest from staff:

In the February 15, 2008 issue of the Water Quality update:

- Well Status Report
- Water Quality Test Results – December 2007 & January 2008
- Well 29 Extended Period Deep Well Pump Test Update
- Ongoing Virus Study Update
- Subscribe to the Drinking Water Quality Listserv


Well Status Report

Except for Unit Well 28, all seasonal wells (6, 8, 10, 17, 27, & 29) are currently shutdown for the winter. Seasonal wells typically operate from April to October when demand for water is higher due to outdoor water use. In a previous Water Quality update, it had been reported that Well 28 would operate through December while maintenance work at Well 26 was completed. Well 28 was briefly taken out of service in January following repairs to Well 26; however, additional work at Well 26 necessitated bringing Well 28 back into service earlier this month. Well 28 will remain in service throughout the remainder of the winter to help maintain reservoir water levels on the southwest side of Madison and to ensure adequate chlorine residuals at the extreme outer limits of the distribution system.


Water Quality Test Results – December 2007 & January 2008

MICROBIOLOGY – In December and January, the Water Utility collected 705 water samples from Water Utility facilities and representative sample locations in the water distribution system. These samples were tested for coliform bacteria – indicators of potential water contamination. No samples tested coliform-positive; all 705 samples collected in December and January were found to have no coliform bacteria present.

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS – The utility also collected samples from five wells and had the water tested for the presence of volatile organic compounds – man-made contaminants that may be present in groundwater. The water utility currently tests four wells (9, 15, 18, & 28) during each three-month period for 42 volatile organic compounds including tetrachloroethylene and carbon tetrachloride. Samples were also collected at three reservoirs (115, 215, & 229) in an effort to better understand distribution system water quality. The table shows the contaminants that were detected, maximum concentration found during this testing period, EPA’s maximum contaminant level (MCL), and the contaminant concentration at each facility. ND means that the contaminant was not detected.


Picture (Metafile)

As the above table attests, Well 15 has the highest level of tetrachloroethylene of all Madison municipal wells. Low levels of the man-made contaminant have been detected at Well 15 since the early 1990’s, and quarterly samples have been collected since 1996. Wells 9 and 18 are also sampled during each three-month period because of the level of tetrachloroethylene that has been found. Additional information on tetrachloroethylene can be found at http://www.epa.gov/safewater/contaminants/dw_contamfs/tetrachl.html

Bromodichloromethane, bromoform, chloroform, and dibromochloromethane are disinfection by-products – compounds that form when chlorine, added as a disinfectant, combines with the impurities in ground water. Because ground water has very little organic matter and low levels of chlorine are needed to kill bacteria and deactivate viruses, the concentrations of disinfection by-products are fairly low.


Well 29 Extended Period Deep Well Pump Test Update

In November, the Water Utility conducted a 21-day full capacity pump test at Unit Well 29. The purpose of the test was to further investigate groundwater movement and drawdown in the area under maximum pumping rates at the well. The consultants, Montgomery Associates and RMT, Inc., presented their findings and recommendations to the Water Utility Board on February 12.

Groundwater levels were continuously measured before, during, and after the pump test at six monitoring wells located in the vicinity of Sycamore Landfill. Groundwater modeling based on the results of the pump test suggests that at maximum pumping rates, or 2300 gallons per minute (gpm), the pumping may capture groundwater from the vicinity of Sycamore Landfill within a period of 15 years. Alternatively, if continuous pumping were maintained at a rate of 1100 gpm, it would probably not capture groundwater from the vicinity of the landfill. The consultants and three area hydrogeologists agree that the model results are very conservative.

The consultant’s recommendations include: (1) pump the well at an average yearly rate of 1100 gpm or a maximum annual water withdrawal of 550 million gallons to avoid long-term impacts from the landfill, and (2) install a sentry well into the lower aquifer at a location between Well 29 and Sycamore Landfill to monitor water quality in a possible migration pathway from the landfill to the well. Monitoring at the sentry well would provide additional information about potential future water quality impacts at Well 29 due to the pumping and also serve as an early warning before the contaminants might reach the drinking water well. The attached link includes the technical memo that was prepared for the Water Utility.

Picture (Metafile)
In response to these results, the Water Utility Board approved a recommendation from Water Utility staff to reduce the operational capacity of the filter at Well 29 from 2200 gpm to 1100 gpm.

Water quality samples were collected prior to shutting down the well at the conclusion of the pump test. Samples were analyzed for over 80 potential organic contaminants. None of the contaminants were detected in the samples. The following link lists all organic contaminants that were tested and the detection limit of each.

<>

Ongoing Virus Study – UW 7, UW 12, UW 13, UW 16, UW 19, & UW 30

Researchers from the Marshfield Clinic (Marshfield, WI), Wisconsin Geological and Natural History Survey (WGNHS), and the United States Geological Survey (USGS) are conducting an on-going investigation into the presence of human viruses in the lower sandstone aquifer from which Madison draws its drinking water. The research group initially tested eleven municipal wells for the presence of adenovirus, enterovirus, hepatitis A, norovirus (Genogroup I & II), and rotavirus. Test results show that in September six wells tested positive for adenovirus and one was positive for enterovirus. In October, four wells had evidence of adenovirus and enterovirus while a fifth was positive for enterovirus only.

Samples that tested positive had a concentration of less than 1 virus per liter, a level well below the infectious dose for healthy individuals. Mark Borchardt, lead researcher for the project, asserts there is no public health threat since chlorine disinfection is effective and sufficient to deactivate the viruses if they are in fact viable. All samples were collected from the groundwater wells prior to chlorination. Madison Water Utility utilizes chlorine to kill viruses and bacteria that may be present in groundwater and to protect against waterborne illness. To provide a margin of safety and also meet future federal groundwater rules, the Water Board approved an increase in the chlorine level at all Madison wells on June 19, 2007.

At the present time, the viability of these viruses is unknown. Molecular techniques (polymerase chain reaction [PCR] analysis), which test for the presence of viral genes, were used to determine the presence of viruses rather than cell culture methods. The researchers plan to perform cell culture studies later in their investigation to determine the viability of the viruses detected.

Following the initial results, the research group plans to collect and analyze monthly samples from a subset of six wells for continued monitoring that is expected to last about a year. Three wells (UW 7, UW 19, UW 30) are cased into the lower, confined aquifer while the other three wells (UW 12, UW 13, UW 16) are not cased through the Eau Claire shale and are referred to as multi-aquifer wells. The Eau Claire shale is a layer of sedimentary rock that separates the upper from the lower aquifer. Newer municipal wells are cased through the shale layer and draw water essentially exclusively from the lower aquifer. When present, the Eau Claire shale is thought to protect the lower aquifer from surface activities that can contaminate groundwater.

Below are the test results for the six wells currently under investigation. A negative result means that none of the six types of viruses was detected. The most recent round of testing, conducted in December and January, shows viruses were detected at two of three confined-aquifer wells and one of three multi-aquifer wells.

Confined Aquifer Wells Multi-Aquifer Wells
UW 7 UW 19 UW 30 UW 12 UW 13 UW 16
2007
September A A Negative A A, E A
October A, E Negative Negative A, E Negative Negative
November ns A, E Negative A Negative Negative
December ns ns ns ns ns Negative
2008
January E A Negative A Negative ns
February
March
May
June
July
August
A = adenovirus, E = enterovirus, H = hepatitis A, N-I = norovirus, genogroup I, N-II = norovirus, genogroup II, R = rotavirus

ns – no sample was collected

Subscribe to the Drinking Water Quality Listserv

People who want to receive regular updates on Madison's drinking water quality can subscribe to this Listserv at:

http://lavos.wiscnet.net/mailman/listinfo/drinkingwaterquality

Sincerely,
Joseph Grande
Water Quality Manager
Madison Water Utility
266-4654


Read more!

Thursday, February 14, 2008

Time Warp: Section 8 Tenants are Criminals

10 years ago, the leading reason cited for why landlords shouldn't have to take Section 8 tenants was that they are criminals. We know better than that, and with some public education and the support of the Apartment Association of South Central Wisconsin, I thought that discussion was put to bed.

Nope . . . joining with the Town of Madison biases against the poor, it looks like Middleton and Sun Prairie believe poor people are criminals. Not only are the homeless to be assumed to be drug dealers, now we can add the disabled and elderly folks that recieve those Section 8 vouchers.

I nominate the following for the most obnoxious, uniformed comments:

Middleton Alderman/landlord Jon DiPiazza
"If that tenant is of a lesser quality than someone else and then they skip out, the landlord is stuck," DiPiazza continued. "The county's ordinance requires landlords to accept them."
Sun Prairie Alderman/Chair of City Council Zach Weber and their Chief of Police
"We were appalled that the county board would pass legislation like this that essentially ties the hands of a landlord," Weber said. "We wanted something with more teeth to deal with some of these criminals. The conversation itself was fairly brief and it passed by a unanimous 8-0 vote."

Weber said Sun Prairie's chief of police was a proponent of the ordinance, adding that it ties in with the community's push to hold landlords more accountable for what goes on in their buildings.
Luckily, County Board Chair Scott McDonell set the record straight:
"Let's make this clear," McDonnell said. "Our ordinance says you can't discriminate against someone simply because they use Section 8; it doesn't say you have to take someone who uses it. There are plenty of reasons to turn away a bad tenant, but using Section 8 has nothing to do with being a bad tenant."
And its not just section 8 tenants, apparently there are other issues of concern to DiPiazza:
"I want someone with an ID card and rental and criminal history," DiPiazza stated.
and
"With a sexual deviant you could easily say that person is a menace, but do you say the same for a pickpocket? Maybe not. That conversation will need to take place."
It sounds like DiPiazza also doesn't understand the protections in the County Ordinance for people with convictions - you can only deny people if their crimes fall within a certain time period and are related to safety concerns of the staff and tenants.

The most absurd part of all of this is:
"Sun Prairie can't override a county ordinance on this and neither can Middleton - period," McDonnell said. "If we get any complaints about discrimination going on [in Sun Prairie] we'll look into it."
and worse yet . . .
Said McDonnell, "All that's going to do is force the county to use resources to establish that the city's ordinance can't override one passed by the county. That's all it will accomplish."
How is it that we, as a society, even here in progressive leaning Dane County, are becoming less tolerant? How is it that it has become so acceptable to hate people based on stereotypes? Instead of working to blend our melting pot it seems some are hellbent on drawing lines in the sand and using stereotypes to judge others and put them, or keep them, down.

Read more!

What's in a name change?

Reorganizations of departments are usually a way of doing something no one really wants to say we are doing. Shuffling around a bad employee, taking and giving power to different employees, masking shifting priorities, making it look like you're addressing a problem, making it seem like you're saving money etc. etc. etc. And sometimes, there may be some unintended consequences. I'm not sure which category falls into, I think its an unintended consequence, but this just doesn't make sense.

I attended the Personnel Board meeting where they discussed changing the title of the Community Development Supervisor to the Economic Revitalization Supervisor. Hmmm . . . the job isn't changing at all, just the title. What was once called Community Development is now called Economic Development, even though the job description describes Community Development activites. The reason given for the change is that this job was placed in the Economic Development section of the new Economic and Community Development unit, not the Community Development section of the new unit and they thought the title would be confusing with a Community Development person in the Economic Development unit.

Check out the description (more on page 3 - 4) of what this person does:
This is responsible supervisory, professional and administrative work relative to the City’s rehabilitation loan and grant programs; homebuyer’s assistance loan and grant programs; lease-purchase housing program; the Tax Exempt Rental Housing Bond Program; and the coordination and management of resources and efforts to revitalize the City’s older housing and neighborhoods. This position serves as staff to the Community Development Authority (CDA), and provides a wide rage of professional and technical support functions relative to community development activities (e.g. neighborhood revitalization, housing rehabilitation and finance, private sector redevelopment, etc.) The employee develops and coordinates assigned programmatic responsibilities with a high degree of independence and initiative. Work is reviewed by the Director of Economic Development for compliance with established goals and objectives.
So, the person does housing work and Community Development, but we'll just call them something else. I think the last line concerns me the most, if they are looking for compliance with the "established goals and objectives" of the Economic Development Unit, what are the chances that will happen? (Or does that refer to individual position "goals and objectives") We already know that this is a Community Development job and would probably better fit the goals and objectives of the Community Development unit.

Also, oddly enough, I don't know why this person has the word "Supervisor" in their title, they only have one person who works below them in the organizational chart. (See page 10.)


Why not just put the job in the right unit instead of having someone do Community Development with an inaccurate Economic Development title so people don't get confused . . . um, I'm confused.

p.s. I'm not picking on Percy, he does a great job - its "us" that don't make sense.

p.p.s. Note, this job description should probably at least allude to the fact that the CDA is not the City and put some type of time limits on how much time is spent on CDA activities and how much time is appropriate to spend on City activities, but that's a whole other can of worms.


Read more!

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Police Behavior & Public Oversight

I thought my Town of Madison incident was odd, but I was watching CBS morning news as I was writing and it and they reported on two other very bizarre incidents both caught on tape:

1. Police toss quadriplegic guy out of his wheelchair because he refuses to stand up.
2. 4 police officers, including 2 men strip search a woman and leave her naked in a jail cell for 6 hours.

Combine that with the discussion on thedailypage about why police can electrocute/tase people an who they electrocute/tase and you can see why there is some healthy skepticism about police behavior.

When we are deluged with information about bad policing behavior and people dying from taser use, the question for me is, when it comes to the tasing issue, who has the appropriate power to review policing matters (Police and Fire Commission or Public Safety Review Board) and will they? Where does the public take their concerns? I believe it is the Public Safety Review Board, but I don't see much action from that committee. They also would have been an appropriate place to provide a forum when the west side folks had concerns about the services they were (n't) getting. How can we beef up that committee to make it work so when the public has concerns they can bring them to this committee? Or are discussions like the one about tasers on thedailypage to be left to speculation on a internet forum?

Read more!

Assume they are drug dealers . . .

A landlord, a drug sniffing dog and a chief of police walk into a press conference . . . I wish it were the beginning to a joke. Yesterday, as a group of homeless people and their advocates were setting up for a press conference (bringing in chairs and a table and some snacks) about how difficult it is to find housing, they were confronted by the menagerie listed above. It was about an hour before the press conference. The police say a neighbor called and said people were moving in. So the landlord and the chief of police were having coffee together and rushed right over. Sounds too absurd to be true.

They get there and the person who has the lease explained that the rent was paid and she had the right to have guests over. The landlord says he expects to be called when she has guests. (It doesn't say that in the lease.) I don't know why, since this landlord has a penchant for spying on his tenants, by sitting in his car outside the apartment or with video cameras and the neighbors seem to be watching the house anyways.

When the tenant presses further about why they are there, the police say that they assume that this house is a drug house. They say they are going to stop anyone who is coming to visit this property. And they do. And they subsequently leave empty handed before the press conference starts.

What kind of a bizarre freak show was that? It happened in the Town of Madison, so many of the tenant protections in the City of Madison don't apply and I don't think our police would have acted that way. To me, it looks like intimidation or retaliation for enforcing their rights. The rest of the story is here.

This incident just underscores how difficult it is for homeless people working together to find housing with co-signors to find housing and the harassment they have to endure because of . . . well, the color of their skin? our biases about the homeless?


Read more!

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

One Stop Shop - $1.6M down the drain?

Rumors have been circulating for some time about a hotel on City property in the downtown area. Such a hotel could incorporate the Municipal Parking lot behind the Municipal Building (215 Martin Luther King Jr Blvd or the "post office building"), or the Government East Parking Ramp. This weekend we got this news article about Marcus having another meeting with the Mayor, but neither party is revealing many details.

The question running through my mind is, what happens to the $1.6M we're spending to have our "One Stop Shop" in the Municipal Building. Will we be throwing that money down the drain as changes occur on the Municipal Building lot? If part of the project is changing entry to the building and if the Municipal Building could be incorporated into the new project, perhaps the project for the "one stop shop" should be delayed, as I proposed as a budget amendment last year (amendment #5)?

Read more!

Another One Bites the Dust

Interesting, another opening in a major staff position for the City of Madison.

I have no idea why Gerald Pace left the City Treasurer's position besides what I've read here and here, but it seems that our treasurer will be serving his last day of employment with the City of Madison on Friday. As alders, typically we'd get some type of notice when a major staff person leaves, but we didn't this time. Certainly we'd get more than a weeks notice that we read in three paragraphs in the local newspapers.

This was a rather short lived employment. We got the press release on the Mayor's choice Oct. 24th, 2007. We approved his appointment at the council meeting on Nov. 20th, 2007. And less than 3 months later, with 2 months of employment, we get that tiny snipet that he is leaving.

I wonder how long the job will stay open this time?

Read more!

Record Snowfall: Madison's Snowiest Ever! - UPDATED

This, from Al Schumacher, Streets Superintendent:
The record has been broken. We have now lived through the snowiest winter season on record with more snow yet to fall today and again on Thursday.

It has been too cold to salt during the overnight hours. We are planning on salting as soon as possible this morning, probably starting at about 9:00 am. It still will be only about 10 degrees at that time but the pavement temperature should be above 15 by then.

So far no plans to plow all residential streets because we have only received slightly more than 1" of dry, fluffy snow that traffic will beat down quite easily. We are expecting between 2" - 3" of total accumulation.

We would like not to plow all residential streets today based on the following factors. One is that this is a dry fluffy snow which is relatively easy to get around in with very little moisture content. Two is the fact that we are expecting more snow on Thursday and if possible, we will wait until then to clean it all up. Three, sunshine is supposed to return on Wednesday which will get some melting on side streets.

All of this is subject to change of course based on additional information.

To be certain, our crews are fatigued but they are hanging in there. They deserve a great deal of praise. Many thanks need to go out to the staffs of Forestry, Engineering, Parks Construction, Parks, Mall Concourse and of course Fleet Services for helping us get through this winter.


Here's a 10:30 update from Mr. Schumacher, Streets Superintendent turned weatherman:
Forecasts do change.

It is not supposed to stop snowing now until close to 2:00 pm. This very light snow is accumulating. We have close to 2.5" on the ground and should definitely reach the 3" amount.

We will be plowing all residential streets starting at 3:00 pm. Because it is such a light and fluffy snow, we will not declare a snow emergency for this storm.

I expect most if not all streets to be plowed by midnight tonight but for sure by early morning on Wednesday.

Salt is not working because of the snow continuing to fall so we have decided against wasting it. We will continue to plow and use sand on our main arterials until the snow stops and we start the residential plowing at 3:00 pm.



p.s. Sorry, I bumped this post below the other two posts today, since I think people are sick of hearing about snow. I don't like doing that, but I felt it was appropriate. i.e. I got the email at 7:30, but I changed the post time to 6:30 so the other two posts appeared first.

Read more!

Monday, February 11, 2008

The Week Ahead: Feb 11th - 15th, 2008

Here's my coughing, sneezing, hacking mucusy miserable look at what's going on this week. Not sure how much of this I'll be making it to since I have a completely miserable cold.

Monday, February 11, 2008
5:30 PM PLAN COMMISSION MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING ROOM 201 CCB
Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Wednesday, February 13, 2008
10:30 AM MINORITY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE ROOM LL-130 MMB
  • This committee has been meeting for years but is going to be official now.
12:00 PM PERSONNEL BOARD ROOM LL-120 MMB
  • Lots of job description changes for the new Economic and Community Development Unit.
4:30 PM URBAN DESIGN COMMISSION ROOM LL-110 MMB
5:35 PM COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION 119 E. OLIN AVENUE
6:30 PM BOARD OF PARK COMMISSIONERS 1625 NORTHPORT DRIVE WPCRC
  • Expansion of services for Supreme Water Sports in James Madison Park (Called Responses to Thomas Murphy at the end of the agenda)
  • Many requests by the Mallards
There's must be more . . . but that's all I could come up with between the sneezing and coughing. I'm going back to bed.
Read more!

Friday, February 8, 2008

Cap Times . . . Progressive Risk Takers.

Since I'm home with a head ache and uber-sore throat after coughing (and not sleeping) all night you get the obligatory comment on the news that the Cap Times is going paperless. People, its the way of the future. Sure, its probably risky, but when you're on the cutting edge and progressive, you have to take risks. I wish them the best of luck in this new endeavor and I hope they can prove that this can work in one of the most wired cities in America and that they become a model for other local papers throughout the country.

Many of the people I talked to or heard from yesterday, are assuming the worst. I kinda agree with Paul Soglin. I see this as an opportunity. When I think of my own behavior, I used to get both papers at work, and the Saturday Cap Times and Sunday State Journal at home. At some point, when info was more available on the internet, we dropped the subscriptions at work. We only needed them to copy articles the Tenant Resource Center appeared in to show our funders we did outreach. Then, I got pissed at the WSJ, who knows over what, but I just couldn't give them money any more. And with the Wisconsin State Journal subscription, went the Saturday Cap Times. I've been reading my news on-line ever since. Sure, I felt a little guilty knowing that their circulation (not readership) was going down, but when I looked at the piles of paper I had to recycle and the creepiness of giving money to Madison Newspapers and my concerns with the extremely biased way they edit their stories, I justified it to myself. So, for me, this change probably doesn't mean much as long as they keep their reporting up to the standards they have had. And that's my concern.

I hear that the news staff is being cut from 40 to 60 and people have to reapply for their reformulated jobs. I really hope they make some good decisions and I feel terrible about the folks losing their jobs. I'm also concerned that what is left of the news in this town will suffer even more. I hope they keep covering all of the issues they have been covering and don't cut back on the news like the Wisconsin State Journal did. This is their strength, beyond the blogsphere, where else are we to get our local news? This is the niche they fill and they need to capitalize on that and then make sure they don't have editors that screw up the news with their biases. Plus, with an internet based product, they will be able to provide even more information to the public through links and not being limited by the amount of space the ink is taking up. Like I said, this could be a really good thing.

Finally, I'm not so sure how this twice weekly thing is going to work out, but I kinda see it as a transition as people get used to the way of the future. I look forward to seeing how this all works out and I hope this community holds them to the same high standards we've always gotten from them!

Read more!

Public Input and Access

That's a pretty boring title for a pretty boring subject, unless you think that your voice should be heard in local government . . . then it is one of the most important, most fundamental issues in our democracy from uber-left to uber-right. The recent flap over the School Board attempting to limit public participation has brought this topic out of quiet little subcommittees and spurred some healthy public discussion. Which is exciting for geeks like me who have been working on these issues for years with a little progress here and a little progress there.

While I'm sympathetic to the school board members who are looking for way to make their meetings more manageable, I also think that, well, there's gotta be a better way to do it. I very much appreciate the student representative, Carol Carstensen and Johnny Winston Jr. who didn't let proposal proceed to a vote the other night.

Putting general public input at the end of the agenda at an unspecified time is essentially saying that they don't want to hear from you in this venue. Cuz only the most tenacious among us would wait until the end of the meeting to speak. It also makes is to that if kids and their parents come to the meeting, the kids can speak but the parents can't unless they take their kids home and come back or keep their kids with them at the meeting. Awkward.

I've been part of the Progressive Dane folks who have been publicly critical, but I've also offered some suggestions. I think what I'm most frustrated by at this point is that I still don't have a copy of the proposal (I have to email staff and ask for it) and it seems that school board members feel like we gave the public wrong information about if there was going to be public input on this proposal.

Luckily, I think both problems can be or are solved. School Board President Arlene Silveira has already talked to staff to figure out how to link the attachments for their agenda. If they can get it worked out technically, this will be GREAT! Then I (and others) won't have to but them or the staff to see what the proposal is that is on the agenda.

Also, we've been informed that even though the meeting on the 18th is a workshop, they are going to allow public testimony on this issue, and this issue only. Thanks to Arlene for making that happen as well.

I guess, in some ways, those two issues show that the school board members are listening. Too bad it had to all happen this way. Hopefully, in the future, we can find ways to have these discussions in a more transparent way that doesn't look so bad and helps to build trust with the public, instead of leaving people questioning their motives.

Now, hopefully they can resolve the underlying issue on the 18th to find a way to make their meeting time productive, but not limit public participation. I have faith they can do that if they continue to listen. Thanks to all the school board members and all the work they do! It's a tough job.

Read more!

Thursday, February 7, 2008

Snow, what else?

On a day like today, how could you talk about anything but snow? After yesterday, I'm sure just about everyone has a story. I'm sure mine pales in comparison to those stuck on the interstate. But for what it is worth here it is. City snow updates at the end of the post.

I went to work at 9:00 yesterday and parked my car on Willy Street. One by one, my 5 meetings got canceled and I just stayed at work. After all, I was already there, people were still calling and walking in (yes, as late as 4:15 someone came in for a housing list), and I had someone there working on my database. Slowly, my car was getting buried deeper and deeper under the snow. This was my car around 2:00.



Around 5:30 I decided it was time to go home, or at least start. I had been plowed in on one side, the snowblower blew snow on top of my car on the other side and a car had been parked behind me and the snow had blown in behind my car. The snow was up to my knees in the best places and as deep as my mid-thigh in others. The snow was over the tires and I couldn't open the door without moving some snow.



And of course, there was at least a foot of snow covering my entire car.



At that point, the smarter (and safer) thing to do would have been to just give up and walk home the 10 blocks to my house. But, ahem, I couldn't do that cuz I was parked on the wrong side of the street for alternate side parking and this morning my car would have been towed because it was in the "commuter lane" on Williamson St. So, I had to move it.

Many strangers and some familiar faces stopped to ask me if I needed help. Being stubborn and not about to let some guy rescue me, I refused all the help. After all, I grew up a Wisconsin farm girl and no snow was going to defeat me. I got the shovel from the Social Justice Center and after I knocked all the snow off my car, proceeded to shovel (between dodging cars on Williamson St.) my way out. It only took me about 20 minutes to do a good enough job to free my car from the pile of snow.

So, I put the shovel away, locked the door to the Social Justice Center and got in my (running) car to see what was going to happen. After rocking my car back and forth a bit and after about 4 attempts I broke free. And proceeded down Willy Street. As I drove by, some of the pedestrians that offered help gave me a big wave and huge smile and thumbs up.

Now that my car was moving, I really, really didn't want to stop. I knew I had a small shovel in my trunk just in case . . . or was it still in there? Anyways, I made it the 6 blocks down Williamson Street, managed not to stop at the corner of Willy and Blair by MG&E and made it to the stop lights at Blair and E. Washington Ave. I then had had to turn left and go one block up the hill where the Madison Metro bus (or buses) had been stuck. I was one block from my house but due to the one way streets, I am forced to go the long way around.

Unfortunately, at this point some car had gotten stuck and I was forced to stop and subsequently got stuck myself. After about 3 cycles of the stoplights, the two cars in front of me had made it through the lights and I was next! I rocked my car back and forth in anticipation of the light turning green and when my turn came I was able to get my car to move forward and navigate my way through the large intersection and across three lanes of traffic so I could immediately turn right on N Franklin.

With a block and a half left to go, I was in the clear. One block down N Franklin, no need to stop at the stop sign, turn the corner and voila! drive in the driveway which my boyfriend had cleared! (His car was parked on the street on the correct side and he left the driveway for me!) Thank goodness I didn't have to circle the blocks looking for a place to shovel a parking space for myself cuz I don't think I could have made it up the hill on E Mifflin St. to get my car into the parking ramp.

Rob had stayed home yesterday as his place of employment ended up closing so he spent over an hour shoveling our 33 feet of sidewalk and the driveway yesterday. I'm so glad I didn't have to do that as well!

I wonder how many people moved their cars last night and where they moved them to? And I wonder if we got our streets plowed even if people did move their cars? I wonder how long it will take me to get to work this morning? Should I walk or drive? Will I need my car? Will my meetings be canceled? Will my employees show up? Ah, I just love Wisconsin! We're about 2 inches away from breaking the record of the biggest snowfall for Madison. What an honor. Can we be done now? I have snow fatigue.

Here's the snow update from the Streets Department
13.3" of snow. 2nd highest single storm event total ever in Madison. (Highest was 17.1" on Dec. 3, 1990)

In 1990, it took us 3 days to completely get the City plowed and 11 days before the cleanup was complete.

We are at 75.1' for the year which is only 1" below the all time record of 76.1" set in the winter of 1978-79.

More snow predicted for Sat. and Sun.

Does anyone see a pattern for this winter?

Trying to move 13.3" of snow takes a lot of extra time. Our crews have to take extra cuts to get the snow back as far as possible. There were a lot of vehicles stranded on streets during the evening and overnight hours. We have had a great deal of difficulty plowing many streets because of these stranded cars. Our vehicles were getting stuck as well trying to push the snow off the roads. There is a lot of work to be done yet with regards to cleaning up the corners and the intersections but for the most part I am very pleased with the snow plowing effort. About 12 hours after a storm of this magnitude ended, the majority of our streets have had plows on them and traffic is able to get around.

We will be continuing with the cleanup today and tonight. We will be applying salt on the salt routes this morning. All available crews will again be assigned to the snow cleanup. We will be suspending Large Item collecton today and maybe further. Refuse and Recycling collection will take place as scheduled. There is still a lot of work to be done.

Snow removal will begin tonight as well as the alternate side plowing during the second night of the snow emergency.

Read more!

Wednesday, February 6, 2008

Canceled! (Updated!)

In case there was any doubt . . . .

Madison Metro (buses) is closing down at 7:00.

Also now updated: Due to deteriorating weather conditions, all non-essential City offices and facilities such as libraries will be closed to the public for the remainder of the day. Regular City operations will resume tomorrow.

As always, numerous City services can be accessed online at www.cityofmadison.com.


Wednesday, February 6, 2008
8:00 AM CENTRAL PARK DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION TASK FORCE (Cancelled) ROOM 101 MMB
12:00 PM PERSONNEL BOARED (Cancelled) ROOM 501 CCB
4:30 PM BOARD OF PUBLC WORKS (Cancelled) ROOM 108 CCB
5:00 PM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (Cancelled) ROOM 201 CCB
5:00 PM HOUSING COMMITTEE (Cancelled) ROOM LL-110 MMB
5:30 PM URBAN DESIGN COMMISSION (Cancelled) ROOM LL-130 MMB
6:30 PM BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC HEARING (Cancelled) ROOM 201 CCB
7:00 PM MADISON AREA TRANSPORTATION PLANNNG BOARD A METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO) (Cancelled) 119 E. OLIN AVENUE


Read more!

Tonight:: Move your Car or Be TOWED!!!

So, they're threatening to use their emergency powers and tow cars tonight. Here's the update from Streets Superintendent Al Schumacher and the Notice of the Snow Emergency. (SEZ = Snow Emergency Zone, i.e. the areas where you only have to alternate side park when they declare a Snow Emergency)
We are expecting snow to continue until about 4:00 pm this afternoon. Snow will be heavy at times with continued blowing and drifting in the outlying areas. A total of around 8" is expected.

We will be concentrating on keeping the main arterials open throughout the day but will have some additional units plowing some of the problematic residential areas that are drifting, have serious hills or curves, etc. We will be utilizing over 70 pieces of equipment during the day. We will commence the plowing of all residential streets at around 3:00 pm this afternoon with the assistance of our hired contractors. At that time, we will have between 150 and 160 pieces of equipment on the road plowing.

I will be declaring a Snow Emergency for the next two nights. People in the Snow Emergency Zone must abide by the alternate parking ordinance. If we don't get compliance, there will be street narrowings just like in December.

To the alders in the SEZ; please assist in getting the word out to your constiuents in any way you can.

I am planning on having Parking Enforcement tow vehicles in areas of the City where people are not abiding by the alternate side parking restrictions and where emergency vehicles and our plows are unable to get through. For the most part, this will be in the SEZ area.

Any comments, contact me.
Here's the email from the listserve you can sign up for:
The City of Madison has declared a snow emergency.

That means that alternate side parking restrictions will be in effect throughout the entire City of Madison including the downtown/isthmus snow emergency zone.

Madison residents are asked to remove all vehicles from the street if possible.

Residents who must park on the street this evening should park on the ODD house numbered side of the street. Vehicles parked on the street Thursday evening February 7th should be parked on the EVEN house numbered side of the street.

Violations of the alternate side parking rules are punishable by a fine of $20 outside the Snow Emergency Zone and $30 inside.

The Snow Emergency will remain in effect until at least 7 a.m. on Friday February 8th.

Parking is available in the cashiered sections of city-owned ramps in the downtown area. During a declared Snow Emergency you can park for no charge at the City ramps from 9 p.m. until 7 a.m. If you enter before 9 p.m. or leave after 7 a.m. you are liable for any parking charges before 1 a.m. and from 7 a.m. until the time you leave. When parking in the ramps overnight, do not park on the top level so this area can be plowed. Be aware that vehicles stored in city ramps longer than 48 hours are subject to being ticketed and towed. Meters in lots and ramps are enforced 24 hours per day, 7 days a week.

NEW, Parking is also available at three central city parks. Residents can park in the lots at Burr Jones Park 1820 E. Washington Av, the boat landing lot of Tenney Park, 1615 Sherman AV (located along the east side of the Yahara River), and beach parking lot at Olbrich Park 3527 Atwood Av.

Madison residents can get complete snow emergency information at www.cityofmadison.com/streets or by calling 261-9111.


And if you're a facebook user, you can sign up for Madison Snow Emergency News to get notifications.
Read more!

Common Council Recap: Feb 5, 2008

As we went into the meeting, several people were commenting about how it was going to be a long meeting. Seemed kinda silly to me, but we dragged it out til after 10:00. Hardly a late night.

Prior to the meeting, I observed the oddest thing. It was a little after 6:00 and there were maybe two or three alders in the room and one member of the public sitting in one seat of the many in the galleries. The so-called "21st alder" strode into the room and actually asked the guy to move because that was "my seat". She followed up by explaining her request in condescending authoritative voice saying "I"m the 21st alder." Stunning. The guy obliged and got up and moved to the other side of the room - I just kept staring at my computer and tried not to get involved. I gotta wonder what he was thinking. How incredibly unnecessarily rude. A real alder wouldn't act that way.

The room quickly filled up after that and the meeting started slightly after 6:30. Mardi Gras beads in tow, matching ties by Alders Verveer and Palm and bad puns by the Mayor started off the meeting. We celebrated Half-Pint Book Day, had some early testimony (I think people were confused), we did our consent agenda where we referred the ridiculously huge zoning re-write committee and its citizen and alder appointments and the hotel/motel ordinance and then went to public hearings.

There were the two projects in district 2 commonly referred to as the Cliff Fisher Project and the Pinkus McBride project. We had quite a bit of testimony for and against the first project, then the Council discussed it for nearly an hour even tho it is likely to be a moot point due to financing issues. 4 or 5 citizens against, only Erik Minton in support beyond the "development team" which was constantly spun as widespread neighborhood support (?!). We had a long, and for geeks like me, somewhat interesting discussion about density, comprehensive plans, PUD criteria, aldermanic courtesy and "larger" and "smaller" buildings. In the end, after some inappropriate questions/accusations to me by Alder Pham-Remmele and a somewhat humorous point in the meeting where the Mayor has to intervene on my behalf, aldermanic courtesy (which Alder Brandon urged the Council to ignore) definitely didn't prevail. Despite a pretty negative staff report, inconsistencies with the Comprehensive Plan and questionable meeting of the PUD standards, the council voted 12 to 8 in favor or the project with a clear split between downtown and periphery alders. Those in favor: Palm, Pham-Remmele, Sanborn, Schumacher, Skidmore, Brandon, Bruer, Clausius, Blear, Cnare, Compton and Gruber. Those in opposition: Kerr, Konkel, Rhodes-Conway, Rummel, Verveer, Webber, Judge and Solomon.

The second, larger but more appropriately placed project passed unanimously without comment. And a big congratulations to Phil Hees, the land owner in the project, for the birth (yesterday!) of his first child. I can't believe he sat there for the entire meeting!

Then we took things slightly out of order to accommodate people who were there to speak.

East Washington BUILD
was next. Big kudos to DMI, neighbors, Curt Brink, MG&E and others who worked with the alders the plan commission subcommittee to reconcile the differences in the various neighborhood plan and getting us all to consensus. The plan passed unanimously with only people in support speaking, now on to the Urban Design District Criteria and the Downtown Transportation Planning! It'll be a huge change a lot more density if that plan comes true and its pretty exciting! Also, tho we didn't take it off the agenda, the Tenney-Lapham Neighborhood Plan passed and I have to say one more time, a HUGE thanks to Patrick McDonnell for working so hard to get that passed.

Then on to the bus wraps, again. (Jed and Zach missed the last meeting where we discussed Allied Drive so Jed reconsidered this item) 3 or 4 people showed up to tell us why they don't like the bus wraps on the buses. Concerns about how dark the buses are, people with visual impairments having difficulties and concerns about the inappropriate advertising of alcohol and gambling were the themes. Alder Brandon got on his high horse about the budget and how we needed this money. I exposed a dirty little secret about the City that in reality, even tho we moan and groan about $10,000 here and $4,000 there, in 2006, we didn't spend $8 million that was budgeted. I attempted to point out that we are frequently over or under budget by various amounts. Metro has a $48.7M budget and $50,000 is a relatively small amount of money which can likely be made up somewhere. Alder Brandon attempted to characterize my comments as me saying "we have plenty of money" but he corrected himself when I objected.

We also discussed why we were amending a pilot project mid-stream, why we don't try half-wraps, who does (downtown) and doesn't (periphery) have constituents that are bothered by these wraps, the hypocrisy of limiting alcohol licenses while sending beer buses around the city, the possibility of getting sued over ADA issues and probably a few other things I'm not remembering at the moment. In the end, they lost a few votes but kept enough for the pilot project with a 11 - 9 vote. Aye votes: Palm, Pham-Remmele, Sanborn, Schumacher, Solomon, Brandon, Bruer, Clausius, Clear, Cnare, Compton. No votes: Kerr, Konkel, Rhodes-Conway, Rummel, Skidmore, Verveer, Webber, Gruber, Judge.

Then we discussed if we should grant or loan money to the CDA. I made the amendment, seconded by Brandon, so it was sure to fail, but we picked up another 4 votes. The issue at hand was during the last meeting we approved the CDA getting a $974,000 and I made an amendment that said if they realize those development fees, we should get paid back (no interest) within 60 days of them getting that money. This had nothing to do with the underlying project, the issue was: Is the CDA the City? Some argued we shouldn't be discussing this project by project or that we were changing the rules of the game, but we did that when we voted on Allied Drive at our last meeting. Those voting with Alder Brandon and myself were Palm, Rhodes-Conway, Sanborn and Webber.

Incredibly, after this discussion, I expected when it came time for introductions at the end of the meeting we would get the report we required in the budget. This is the amendment we passed unanimously:
"By February 1, 2008, the CDA will report to the Council on its annual work plan for 2008. Absent such a plan, the Comptroller's Office will initiate billings to the CDA for all City personnel charges to the CDA for 2007 and for the remainder of 2008."
While the plan was emailed to us on February 1st, it was never introduced to the council.

The Council then scattered, with Judge and Brandon joining the Barack Obama party at Brocach and Webber, Rummel, Konkel, Solomon, Kerr opting for the Great Dane. Others were scared off by the weather and went home.

Read more!

Monday, February 4, 2008

The Week Ahead: Feb 4th, 2008

Here's a few things of interest for this week.

Monday, February 4, 2008
4:00 PM
TAX INCREMENTAL FINANCING POLICY AD HOC COMMITTEE ROOM LL-110 MMB
  • If we get quorum, we'll once again discuss what to do to make sure that if developers promise certain things to the city to get TIF money based on their development plans, how do we get our money back if they don't deliver?
4:30 PM AD HOC COMMITTEE OF PARK COMMISSION TO STUDY PROBLEM OF ALCOHOL AND RELATED BEHAVIORS IN CITY PARKS ROOM 108
  • I haven't seen this on the schedule for quite some time. I wonder if they have made any progress since last summer?
Tuesday, February 5, 2008
4:30 PM COMMON COUNCIL ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITTEE ROOM 103A CCB
5:00 PM AFFIRMATIVE ACTON COMMISSION ROOM LL-120 MMB
6:30 PM COMMON COUNCIL ROOM 201 CCB
Wednesday, February 6, 2008
12:00 PM PERSONNEL BOARD ROOM 501 CCB
  • 7 job changes that have to do with reorganization of the Assessor's Office and the Economic & Community Development Unit
5:00 PM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION ROOM 201 CCB
  • Presentation of the Draft of the Economic Development Plan
5:00 PM HOUSING COMMITTEE ROOM LL-110 MMB
Thursday, February 7, 2008
5:00 PM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT COMMISSION MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING ROOM 310 CCB
  • Public hearing on 2007, Emerging Trends and Priorities for 2009-2010


Read more!

Saturday, February 2, 2008

Never ending snow . . . .and snow trivia.

Here's the latest update from the head of the Streets Department . . .
We were supposed to get less than 1/2" of snow today. It continued to develop and dropped closer to 1.5". This snow coupled with the close to 2" on Thursday and Thursday night and the snow from earlier in the week has made many of our residential streets in need of plowing.

We will be plowing all residential streets this evening and finish through the overnight. I will not declare a snow emergency.
Here's the snow trivia from Friday's update:
Since Dec. 1st - It has snowed on 34 out of 63 days or 54% of the days.
Normal snow for winter season - 48.8"
Snow totals so far this winter season - 58.4"
Madison's record winter snowfall - 1978-1979 - 76.1"
We are less than 18" from setting the all time record with all of February, March and into April yet to go


Read more!

Friday, February 1, 2008

This is just silly.

Ok - so I heard about this from 3 or 4 people before it was in the newspaper and its been bugging me, but when you put it in context, it gets even sillier.

The CDA and United Way think that if poor people only managed their money better they wouldn't be poor. Um . . . no amount of financial management classes is going to "fix the problem" that if you get $673 per month for your "volunteer"/community service work on W-2 and your rent is $550 you have $123 left. Foods stamps will get you food, and badgercare will take care of health needs, but the $123 isn't even going to cover many childcare subsidies people are paying these days. Maybe you're one of the people who got lucky and won the "lottery" to get on a waiting list to get section 8, but that's all you got, you're on a waiting list. That's why when the United Way and CDA trumpets their $50,000 per year that they want to spend to help people in Allied Drive manage their money, it just makes we want to laugh. Or, roll my eyes as I did on Stuart Levitan's show when he asked me about it. Or cry.

Add to this, the new report that being black in Wisconsin is the worst place in America to be black. Or worse, you could be one of those hard working people who wasn't born here that makes a minor mistake with big consequences. It just adds to ridiculous fiasco of spending so much money to create housing that isn't guaranteed to be affordable to those who need it the most, people below 30% AMI. We aren't addressing the real underlying issues, we're just making things look good and pretending that we're "fixing" the problem. Meanwhile, real people are living real lives that this financial counseling and "affordable housing" won't do a thing for them. And, most of them are still black (or may be "illegal") in Wisconsin.

When we will we get serious about addressing these serious issues? When will we start providing people with services that they need - meaningful job training, case management to address various issues, affordable housing, childcare subsidies, bus routes that don't take an hour to get most places, etc etc etc - instead of doing things that have the appearance of helping or adding more police to arrest them? And can we talk about the impact that race/immigration status has on all of this?

Read more!